Page deleted. problem is, I can't remember what it originally was, though it was certainly something about the Oslo Report.That comes back 404, now, & the home page doesn't mention Norway or Oslo.
@fester may remember, afraid I can't.
Page deleted. problem is, I can't remember what it originally was, though it was certainly something about the Oslo Report.That comes back 404, now, & the home page doesn't mention Norway or Oslo.
Page deleted. problem is, I can't remember what it originally was, though it was certainly something about the Oslo Report.
@fester may remember, afraid I can't.
Thx. (Like I don't have too much to read already. )Page deleted. problem is, I can't remember what it originally was, though it was certainly something about the Oslo Report.
The destroyers' 3 inch guns were firing low and below the towed target consistently.
Possible typo but wouldn't it be new 3 inch shells instead of 5 inch shells ordered?Cables were being prepared to request new 5 inch shells fresh from American factories.
3 inch shells from the destroyers were working fine. The issue was the crew skill but the equipment was good (enough).Possible typo but wouldn't it be new 3 inch shells instead of 5 inch shells ordered?
You're assuming the shells are going roughly where intended ... they could just be really, really, really far offOn the plus side, at least they knew the target was being towed and not pushed. There's at least one case where the gunners confused plane and towed target. Fortunately, neither were in any danger.
You're assuming the shells are going roughly where intended ... they could just be really, really, really far off
a butter bar that no one likedTrue.
Who'd be the pilot of a plane pulling a target.
The Houston carried 8 x 1 x 5"/25 caliber Antiaircraft guns, which were also capable of surface fire, good, but not as good as the new 5"/ 38 caliber dual purpose guns on the modern destroyers, and cruisers, launched after the New Orleans class, and early Brooklyn classes.Possible typo but wouldn't it be new 3 inch shells instead of 5 inch shells ordered?
I was about to ask what was what with the Charlie Root post when another update came along on Irma...lost my train of thought...about to get pounded here north of Ft Lauderdale. Oh well, can't win 'em all...
I was about to ask what was what with the Charlie Root post when another update came along on Irma...lost my train of thought...about to get pounded here north of Ft Lauderdale. Oh well, can't win 'em all...
Yes, Illustrious was repaired at Norfolk in both TTL and OTL. Singapore was just coming online as a major base in the spring of 1941 and did not have full repair capacity.A while ago people were discussing the Asiatic fleet moving to Singapore, and someone mentioned that the British said they wanted Illustrious to be repaired in the United States and said Singapore did not have the facilities to repair her. Was this actually true? I find it hard to believe, since Singapore was supposed to be the main base for a Far East fleet.
Yes, Illustrious was repaired at Norfolk in both TTL and OTL. Singapore was just coming online as a major base in the spring of 1941 and did not have full repair capacity.
A while ago people were discussing the Asiatic fleet moving to Singapore, and someone mentioned that the British said they wanted Illustrious to be repaired in the United States and said Singapore did not have the facilities to repair her. Was this actually true? I find it hard to believe, since Singapore was supposed to be the main base for a Far East fleet.