How much trouble would it be to bring a ro-ro concept to life by, say, 1939?
what about more SEATRAIN ships?
How much trouble would it be to bring a ro-ro concept to life by, say, 1939?
No support equipment at the dockside in Dunkirk. The adjustable loading ramp was on the dock, not on the shipsSuch a shame they didn't go into Dunkirk. The BEF might have been able to save some of it's equipment if they had.
No support equipment at the dockside in Dunkirk. The adjustable loading ramp was on the dock, not on the ships
Sorry I wasn't clear with what I wrote. What I meant was if Dunkirk had been a Rail Ferry terminal they could have used the ferries to save some of the BEF's equipment.No support equipment at the dockside in Dunkirk. The adjustable loading ramp was on the dock, not on the ships
Going on the assumption the Pacific war starts more or less on time as o.t.l. will you be giving us an order of battle i.t.t.l. compared to o.t.l. Would be very grateful if you can find the time for such posts.
Yes, I have one written for Der Tag minus a week. But pieces need to move a bit more
And also, with the containing of the Italian threat, Britain has much more of a hand choose on what they can send to the Far East. Since they are not tied up fighting Rommel and the uber Afrika Korps (ITTL, Rommel was bayonetted by a British solider who died in France and the commander who lead the Korps was much more cautious) and can actually contain them without much of a worry of more offensives, more forces can be spread elsewhere.Britain is going to receive a major boost, as she can effectively ignore the Mediterranean Theatre, other than as a shipping route for the next twelve months.
The shipping crisis in 42, as the German U-Boat arm got into its stride, will be greatly reduced.
There is no doubt that the two major Axis powers, Germany and Japan, IOTL, managed to throw a lot of sixes. Italy however seemed to be constantly failing from day one, and only scored one win in the first six months of their involvement. And that was in an out of the way area, and wasn't truly exploitable. However with the benefits of hindsight, we can see that the weakness of the Axis powers was evident from the start. Had the French and British made a real effort to invade Germany, while they were fighting the Polish campaign, the Germans would have been in a world of hurt.
The Norwegian campaign was very much a Pyrrhic victory, as it saw the destruction of the German surface navy as an effective fighting force. And that along with the failure of the German Airforce during the Battle of Britain, scuppered any hopes of a successful invasion of Britain. With Britain still in the war, Germany was reliant on Russia for a lot of strategic imports, which she promptly invaded.
Thanks to events in Europe and the Middle East, along with facing the captain of the school third eleven. The Japanese were able to bluff their way to victory in the Malaysian Peninsula. We know that at the time of the Siege of Singapore, the Japanese were out of supplies and could have been pushed back to where they started from.
The butterflies ITTL, are now truly in flight, and the events from now are going to be increasing different from what they were IOTL. The failure of the Axis to capture Crete, and the absence of Rommel from North Africa, mean that the Middle East, is far more stable and less demanding than it was. And while the captain of the third eleven is still in charge in Malaysia, his leading batsman is first class, and isn't going to be bowled out by the opposition. The team in North Africa are grinding the opposition down and are within a year of a victory.
The Germans are deeper and stuck tightly to the tar baby that is the Russian campaign, and thus unable to intervene in North Africa, to any greater extent than they already are. Once the Italians in the Red Sea region are dealt with, and the North African Shore cleared. Britain is going to receive a major boost, as she can effectively ignore the Mediterranean Theatre, other than as a shipping route for the next twelve months. Time to train, experiment and absorb the lessons from the recent campaign, especially the forthcoming amphibious operations. There will be much less pressure to bring new equipment into service, before proper testing and training has taken place. This is especially true of armoured vehicles, as the present generation is more than adequate for combat in the Far East.
The shipping crisis in 42, as the German U-Boat arm got into its stride, will be greatly reduced. The Mediterranean route is worth five million tons of shipping, thanks to the reduction in transit times. And the ability to source some vital supplies from the area, rather than from the Americas. And the combination of 3% here, 2% there and 5% somewhere else, improvements will add up to something substantial by late 42, early 43. In spite of the upcoming problems in the Far East, and the diversion of resources that this will entail. The ability of the British to manage their involvement, and take part in as little of the war as best suites them in particular areas, is priceless. And once the Americans get dragged into the ongoing conflict, the war is essentially won, its just the method and timing that are in question.
RR.
The shipping crisis of 1942 was entirely due to USN bad tactics on the US Eastern Seaboard and Caribbean
Over 25% of all shipping lost to the UBs in the whole war, worldwide were lost in those area in 6 months.
Doenitz was quite reactive, moving his boats to where he thought they could sink most at least cost. In these circumstances the main effort after the opening of US-German hostilities, whenever that is, may well be directed further south - Florida, the Caribbean - with just a few sorties up north (minelaying?).I agree that the USN has to get on the convoy bandwagon sooner, and also get the coastal towns to really blackout. However with the changes in the naval balance in the Atlantic, due to the relative weakening of the Axis threat in the Med, getting U-Boats to the US coast is going to be more difficult.
We've got enough WWII threads around that I may be misremembering, but IIRC @fester has explicitly said that the 2nd Happy Time will still happen, that the underlying tactical and strategic errors of the US are still there.TTL throughout this tale Fester has been shifting that attitude as well as feeding significant resources into USN ASW capability.
IMHO this shift is the weakest part of this narrative. As far as I can see there has been no plausible justification for any such change
(except perhaps a completely understandable desire to remove this blot on the USNs record)
We've got enough WWII threads around that I may be misremembering, but IIRC @fester has explicitly said that the 2nd Happy Time will still happen, that the underlying tactical and strategic errors of the US are still there.
As for building more escorts, well, duh, if you're building more of everything else, you build more escorts. IIRC, too, some of the new escorts were earmarked for/sold to the Brits/Canadians. The huge advantage is that the small yards building small escorts are 1) already partly ramped up, and 2) building something better than the 'Oh, God, we need something NOW Flower class'.
Thus, US shipping lost in the first 6 months is still, IMO, going to be about 1/4 the total (or so), but those totals will be smaller, and so will the US losses.
This isn't a 'weak part', it's perfectly logical. In fact, I think he's gone TOO far (in what he's foreshadowed) in bending over backwards to keep US losses up.