A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

Haha - there's a problem. The first is unoriginality. Which is not so scary... If it weren’t for the second thing, after the collapse of the USSR what I call a pop apocalypse happened.
After the collapse of the USSR, the commercialization of music reached its peak. And the newly minted producers developed a scheme - the creation of mediocre ensembles with aggressive PR. That is, for example, they took three girls who may not even sing but simply open their mouths to the soundtrack (which will be performed by some conservatory graduate who cannot find a job). And he actively plays it on TV and radio until people get used to it and start to like it. In the nineties and early 2000s, this happened all the time.
 
Chapter Seventeen: A new status quo in Europe (May 2000 - March 2001)
Following the first national referendum to be held in the Union State, death penalty has been abolished, though it was not the first time in Russia's history when it was done. The Soviet government confirmed the abolition almost immediately after the October Revolution, but restored it soon after. Most notably, Socialist-Revolutionary Fanny Kaplan was executed on 4 September 1918 for her attempt to assassinate Lenin six days earlier. Hangings and shootings very extensively employed by the Bolsheviks as part of their Red Terror. Over the next several decades, the death penalty was alternately permitted and prohibited, sometimes in very quick succession. The list of capital crimes likewise underwent several changes. Under the rule of Joseph Stalin, many were executed during the Great Purge in the 1930s. Many of the death sentences were pronounced by a specially appointed three-person commission of officials, the NKVD troika. The exact number of executions is debated, with archival research suggesting it to be between 700,000 and 800,000, whereas an official report to Nikita Khrushchev from 1954 cites 642,980 death penalties, another report in 1956 688,503, of which 681,692 were carried out during the years of 1937-1938. The verdict of capital punishment in the Soviet Union was called the "Supreme Measure of Punishment" (Vysshaya Mera Nakazaniya, VMN). Verdicts under Article 58 (counter-revolutionary activity) often ended with a sentence that was abbreviated as VMN, and usually followed by executions through shooting, though other frequent verdicts were 10 years and 25 years (dubbed "Сталинский четвертак" Stalinskiy chetvertak, "Stalin's Quarter") sentences. The death penalty was again abolished on 26 May 1947, the strictest sentence becoming 25 years' imprisonment, before it was restored on 12 May 1950 first for treason and espionage, and then for aggravated murder. According to Western estimates, in the early 1980s Soviet courts passed around 2,000 death sentences every year, of which two-thirds were commuted to prison terms. According to the GARF archives database, between 1978 and 1985 there were 3,058 sentences to death that had been appealed to the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. At least one woman was executed during this time, Antonina Makarova, on 11 August 1978. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation carried out the death penalty intermittently, with up to 10 or so officially a year.

The new government of Elvira Nabiullina shortly after being sworn in, began working to dealing with Russia's overdependence on export of fossil fuels, underdevelopment of rural regions, falling fertility rate and aging population. To diversify the Union's economy, the government implemented a series of following initiatives:
  • implementation of tax cuts and subsidies to manufacturing, clean energy, R&D of semiconductors, pharmaceutical industry, chemical industry and auto industry;
  • conducting a review to verify which economic sector has the greatest importance depending on the region;
  • a discouragement of the majority of investments from ending up in a few focused points, causing them to be developed to the detriment of many other areas;
  • an encouragement of specialization in two or more industries per region in the Union State.

derevnia-lodki-kimzha-arkhangelskaia-oblast-rassvet-reka-min-1.jpg

(Investments made in the Russian contryside by goverment of Elvira Nabiullina would bring very positive results in the future)

Secondly, the Union's government focused on the development of the countryside and rural regions by:
  • investments in transport and communication infrastructure;
  • a promotion of a rural industry, by granting to the products of recognized quality Certificates of Denomination of Origin;
  • promoting a protection of rural brands and goods;
  • investments into a public places like parks and other places for recreational purposes;
    investing in modernization of schools and hospitals in rural regions;
  • tax cuts for places like Caffès, or night Clubs, where young people could spend time together;
  • encouragement of tourism in countryside, including state sponsored excursions to countryside from schools, paid vacations to countryside from companies;
  • promotion of development of rural middle-class of farmers and workers;
  • expansion and modernization of farms across Russia.

ph_14787_70850.jpg

(As a result of Nabullina's actions, Russia in coming decades, contrary to many European and Asian states would
experience a growth of population)

Nevertheless, the biggest challenge for the government of Elvira Nabiullina was addressing the ongoing demographic changes in Russia. To tackle the issue, the Union government introduced a number of laws and undertook a series of initiatives, including:
  • tax breaks for families
  • campaign against alcohol, nicotine and other stimulants
  • increased investments into healthcare system
  • introduction of programs focused on helping elderly population
  • increased maternity and paternity leaves
  • increased financial aid to families
  • allowing tax deductions per child
  • increased number of daycare centers
  • reduction of consumption taxes on children's products
  • a change of the retirement age for parents depending on number of children
  • increased pensions for parents
  • increased bonuses from the state to salary based on number of children
  • founding of a state bank that would provide families with cheap housing loans
  • introduction of the Bill for Family Empowerment, which would include:
Financial Aid - Family with two children or more. It should be fixed according to financial status of each family.
Parental Leave - Extend and encourage the parental leave from work so that each parent can be with their children during their early childhood.
Childcare - New daycare and childcare facilities with trained workers to provide a balanced work-life for parents.
Housing - Provide new family reduction in acquiring a new home and also a reduction for rent.
Education - Each parent can attend a parental education program to improve their knowledge and skills.

  • Increased efforts to promote child-safe activities and sports
  • increased funds to sports development for children
  • renting assistance to families
  • increased education funding
  • increased taxes on childless adults
The formation of the Union State in 1999 was met with a very mixed result in Europe and the United States. On the one hand, government in Western Europe (especially in Germany, France and Italy) welcomed the developments, seeing increased economic and business potential in Russia. Additionally, France and Germany wanted to use a newly resurgent Russia to counterbalance the American hegemony in Europe. On the other hand, governments in Eastern and Central Europe were concerned about the Moscow's growing economic, political and military potential. Some political figures in the region argued that the Union State, after the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, is another Russian imperial project focused on dominating its neighbors. This forced the government of the Baltic States to apply for NATO membership, which was calculated for avoiding Russian domination of the Baltic Area. In the meantime, the policymakers in Washington were also concerned with increasing Russian assertiveness on the international stage. The latest developments in Yugoslavia confirmed only the fact that Washington and Moscow were not allies, but rather strategic rivals. Nevertheless, by year 2001, after a series of secret negotiations between Moscow and Washington, a new status quo was created on the European continent was established, as both powers expanded their sphere of influence, following expansions of both NATO and CSTO. The following countries became members of NATO: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, while at the same time the following countries joined CSTO: Georgia, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Ukraine. Nonetheless, Ukraine's President Petro Symomenko, to avoid unnecessary tensions with the Nationalists in Western and Central Ukraine, has decided to appoint a liberal-nationalist Yulia Tymoshenko to the position of Prime Minister of Ukraine. These international developments marked Russia's rise from regional power to the status of a great power, as now Moscow had an influence not only in the post-Soviet region.

unnamed.jpg

(The canonization of the Russian Imperial family)

The canonization of the Romanovs (also called "glorification" in the Russian Orthodox Church) was the elevation to sainthood of the last Imperial Family of Russia – Tsar Nicholas II, his wife Tsarina Alexandra, and their five children Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and Alexei – by the Russian Orthodox Church. The family was killed by the Bolsheviks on 17 July 1918 at the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg. The house was later demolished. The Church on Blood was built on this site, and the altar stands over the execution site. On 1 November 1981, Grand Duke Michael Alexandrovich of Russia (the younger brother of Nicholas II) and his secretary, Nicholas Johnson, were canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia. The two men were both murdered at Perm on 13 June 1918. On 15 August 2000, the Russian Orthodox Church announced the canonization of Nicholas II and his immediate family for their "'humbleness, patience and meekness'" during their imprisonment and execution by the Bolsheviks. The canonizations were controversial for both branches of the Russian Orthodox Church. In 1981, opponents noted Nicholas II's perceived weaknesses as a ruler and said that his actions had led to the Bolshevik Revolution, which caused so much damage for Russia and its people. One priest of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad noted that martyrdom in the Russian Orthodox Church has nothing to do with the martyr's personal actions but was instead related to why he or she was killed. Other critics noted that the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad appeared to be blaming Jewish revolutionaries for the deaths and equating the political assassination with a ritual murder. Others rejected the family's being classified as new martyrs because they were not killed because of their religious faith. There was no proof that the execution was a ritual murder. Religious leaders in both churches also had objections to canonizing the Tsar's family because they perceived him to have been a weak emperor whose incompetence led to the revolution, and the suffering of his people. They said he was at least partially responsible for his own murder and the murders of his wife and children. For these opponents, the fact that the Tsar was said to be, in private life, a kind man and a good husband and father did not override his poor governance of Russia. Despite their official designation as "passion-bearers" by the August 2000 Council, the family are referred to as "martyrs" in Church publications, icons, and in popular veneration by the people. Since the late 20th century, believers have attributed healing from illnesses or conversion to the Orthodox Church to their prayers to Maria and Alexei, as well as to the rest of the family.

43208152355_497331b1e2_b.jpg

(The Millenium Summit which was held in New York)

The Millennium Summit was a meeting among many world leaders, lasting three days from 6 to 8 September 2000, held at the United Nations headquarters in New York City. Its purpose was to discuss the role of the United Nations at the turn of the 21st century. At the meeting, world leaders ratified the United Nations Millennium Declaration. This meeting was the largest gathering of world leaders in history as of 2000. It was followed five years later by the World Summit, which took place from 14 to 16 September 2005. The General Assembly Resolution that decided upon this summit stated that it attempted to seize "a unique and symbolically compelling moment to articulate and affirm an animating vision for the United Nations". In this summit, 189 member states of the United Nations agreed to help citizens in the world's poorest countries to achieve a better life by 2015. The framework for this progress is outlined in the Millennium Development Goals. Also known as the MDGs, these goals were derived from the Millennium Declaration. This summit was focused on various global issues, such as poverty, AIDS, and how to share the benefits of globalisation more fairly. On 5 September 2000, delegates around the world began to travel to the United States for the Millennium Summit. American airline officials inspected the delegation of North Korea at Frankfurt International Airport during a stop in Germany. American Airlines personnel demanded that the members of the delegation and their belongings be searched. In response to these demands, the North Korean government withdrew its delegation from the summit. As diplomats, the officials should not have been subject to search.

Over 150 world leaders participated in the discussion, including 100 heads of state, 47 heads of government, three crown princes, five vice presidents, three deputy prime ministers, and 8,000 other delegates. The Group of 77 was also present to discuss the changes the United Nations faced at the turn of the 21st century. The president of Finland, Tarja Halonen, and the president of Namibia, Sam Nujoma, co-chaired the Millennium Summit. This was due to the presidency over the General Assembly of Theo-Ben Gurirab in the fifty-fourth session and that of Harri Holkeri in the fifty-fifth session. Therefore, the heads of state of Finland and Namibia were chosen to preside over the summit. Kofi Annan, the secretary-general of the United Nations, opened the Millennium Summit on 6 September 2000. Before moving into the summit, Annan called for a minute's silence for four United Nations workers who were killed in West Timor by pro-Indonesian militiamen. U.S. President Bill Clinton and Union State's President Alexander Lukashenko delivered a plea for world peace and cooperation. Sixty-three other speakers spoke for five minutes each. In the duration of the summit, Bill Clinton held separate meetings with Israel's prime minister, Ehud Barak, and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, calling on them to reach a peace agreement between the two nations, although no actual progress was made in doing so. Both sides were still committed to reaching such an agreement, however. On 7 September, various heads of state discussed peacekeeping issues. They discussed these issues at a round-table meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Seventy speakers were scheduled for this day during the summit, including Chinese President Jiang Zemin, South African President Thabo Mbeki, Sri Lankan President Chandrika Kumaratunga, Japanese Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori, and President of Sierra Leone Ahmad Kabbah. The final day of the Millennium Summit, 8 September, ended after 60 world leaders each gave their five-minute speech. The speakers included Indonesian President Abdurrahman Wahid, Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, and Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee.

The world leaders who attended the Millennium Summit adopted the Millennium Declaration, striving to "free all men, women, and children from the abject and dehumanizing conditions of extreme poverty". By the end of the summit, the Millennium Declaration's eight chapters were drafted, from which the Millennium Development Goals, originally developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), were particularly promoted in the years following the summit. The delegates at this summit agreed on the following eight chapters:

Values and Principles
Peace, Security and Disarmament
Development and Poverty Eradication
Protecting Our Common Environment
Human Rights, Democracy and Good Governance
Protecting the Vulnerable
Meeting the Special Needs of Africa
Strengthening the United Nations.

USS_Cole_(DDG-67)_Departs.jpg

(Bombing of the USS Cole was another attack mate by al-Qaeda made on the orders made by Osama Bin-Laden)

The USS Cole bombing was a suicide attack by al-Qaeda against USS Cole, a guided missile destroyer of the United States Navy, on 12 October 2000, while she was being refueled in Yemen's Aden harbor. Seventeen U.S. Navy sailors were killed and thirty-seven injured in the deadliest attack against a United States naval vessel since the USS Stark incident in 1987. Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the attack against the United States. A U.S. judge has held Sudan liable for the attack, while another has released over $13 million in Sudanese frozen assets to the relatives of those killed. The United States Navy has reconsidered its rules of engagement in response to this attack. On 30 October 2020, Sudan and the United States signed a bilateral claims agreement to compensate families of the sailors who died in the bombing. The agreement entered into force in February 2021. On the morning of Thursday, 12 October 2000, Cole, under the command of Commander Kirk Lippold, docked in Aden harbor for a routine fuel stop. Cole completed mooring at 9:30 and began refueling at 10:30. Around 11:18 local time (08:18 UTC), a small fiberglass boat carrying C4 explosives and two suicide bombers approached the port side of the destroyer and exploded, creating a 40-by-60-foot (12 by 18 m) gash in the ship's port side, according to the memorial plate to those who lost their lives. Former CIA intelligence officer Robert Finke said the blast appeared to be caused by C4 explosives molded into a shaped charge against the hull of the boat. More than 1,000 pounds (450 kg) of explosive were used. Much of the blast entered a mechanical space below the ship's galley, violently pushing up the deck, thereby killing crew members who were lining up for lunch. The crew fought flooding in the engineering spaces and had the damage under control after three days. Divers inspected the hull and determined that the keel had not been damaged.

The sailors injured in the explosion were taken to the United States Army's Landstuhl Regional Medical Center near Ramstein, Germany, before being sent to the United States. The attack was the deadliest against a U.S. naval vessel since the Iraqi attack on USS Stark on 17 May 1987. The asymmetric warfare attack was organized and directed by the terrorist organization al-Qaeda. In June 2001, an al-Qaeda recruitment video featuring Osama bin Laden boasted about the attack and encouraged similar attacks. Al-Qaeda had previously attempted a similar but less publicized attack on the U.S. Navy destroyer USS The Sullivans while in port at Aden on 3 January 2000, as a part of the 2000 millennium attack plots. The plan was to load a boat full of explosives and detonate them near The Sullivans. However, the boat was so overladen that it sank, forcing the attack to be abandoned. Planning for the October attack was discussed at the Kuala Lumpur al-Qaeda Summit from 5 to 8 January, shortly after the failed attempt. Along with other plotters, the summit was attended by future 11 September hijacker Khalid al-Mihdhar, who then traveled to San Diego, California. On 10 June 2000, Mihdhar left San Diego to visit his wife in Yemen at a house also used as a communications hub for al-Qaeda.After the bombing, Yemeni Prime Minister Abdul Karim al-Iryani reported that Mihdhar had been one of the key planners of the attack and had been in the country at the time of the attacks. He later returned to the United States to participate in the 9/11 hijacking of American Airlines Flight 77, which flew into the Pentagon, killing 184 people.


islamic_emirate_of_afghanistan__1996_2001___2021___by_alejandrogmj_ddxdgr9-fullview.jpg


The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, also referred to as the First Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, was a totalitarian Islamic state led by the Taliban that ruled most of Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. At its peak, the Taliban government controlled approximately 90% of the country, while remaining regions in the northeast were held by the Northern Alliance, which maintained broad international recognition as a continuation of the Islamic State of Afghanistan. After the September 11 attacks and subsequent declaration of a "War on Terror" by the United States, international opposition to the regime drastically increased, with diplomatic recognition from the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan being rescinded. The Islamic Emirate ceased to exist on 7 December 2001 after being overthrown by the Northern Alliance, which had been bolstered by the ISAF coalition established after a U.S.-led invasion of the country two months prior. The Taliban continued to refer to itself as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan in official communications when it was out of power from 2001. The Taliban and its rule arose from the chaos after the Soviet–Afghan War. It began as an Islamic and Pashtun politico-religious movement composed of madrasa students in southern Afghanistan. Overwhelmingly ethnic Pashtuns, the Taliban blended Pashtunwali tribal code with elements of Salafist teaching to form an anti-Western and anti-modern Islamist ideology with which it ruled. It began to receive support from neighbouring Pakistan as well as from Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. A small Taliban militia first emerged near Kandahar in the spring and summer of 1994, committing vigilante acts against minor warlords, with a fund of 250,000 USD from local businessmen. They soon began to receive backing from local Durrani Pashtun leaders.

The first major military activity of the Taliban was in October–November 1994 when they marched from Maiwand in southern Afghanistan to capture Kandahar City and the surrounding provinces, losing only a few dozen men. Starting with the capture of a border crossing and a huge ammunition dump from warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, a few weeks later they freed "a convoy trying to open a trade route from Pakistan to Central Asia" from another group of warlords attempting to extort money. In the next three months this hitherto "unknown force" took control of twelve of Afghanistan's 34 provinces, with Mujahideen warlords often surrendering to them without a fight and the "heavily armed population" giving up their weapons. The Taliban initially enjoyed enormous good will from Afghans weary of the corruption, brutality, and the incessant fighting of Mujahideen warlords. However, reactions and resistance would vary and increase among non-Pashtun people. The Taliban considered many of Afghanistan's other ethnic communities as foreign. Pashtun people are the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan and comprised the vast majority of the Taliban movement. As the Taliban expanded from their southern and south-eastern strongholds, they encountered more resistance; their brand of Deobandism, incorporated with the Pashtunwali tribal code, was viewed as foreign by the other ethnic groups of Afghanistan. The Battles of Mazar-i-Sharif illustrated this ethnic tension.

Spreading from Kandahar, the Taliban eventually captured Kabul in 1996. By the end of 2000, the Taliban controlled 90% of the country, aside from the opposition (Northern Alliance) strongholds found primarily in the northeast corner of Badakhshan Province. Areas under the Taliban's direct control were mainly Afghanistan's major cities and highways. Tribal khans and warlords had de facto direct control over various small towns, villages, and rural areas. The Taliban sought to establish law and order and to impose a strict interpretation of Islamic Sharia law, along with the religious edicts of Mullah Mohammed Omar, upon the entire country of Afghanistan. During the five-year history of the Islamic Emirate, the Taliban regime interpreted the Sharia in accordance with the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence and the religious edicts of Mullah Omar. The Taliban forbade pork and alcohol, many types of consumer technology such as most music, television, and film, as well as most forms of art such as paintings or photography, male and female participation in sport, including football and chess; recreational activities such as kite-flying and keeping pigeons or other pets were also forbidden, and the birds were killed according to the Taliban's ruling. Movie theaters were closed and repurposed as mosques. Celebration of the Western and Iranian New Year was forbidden. Taking photographs and displaying pictures or portraits was forbidden, as it was considered by the Taliban as a form of idolatry. Women were banned from working, girls were forbidden to attend schools or universities, were requested to observe purdah (physical separation of the sexes) and awrah (concealing the body with clothing), and to be accompanied outside their households by male relatives; those who violated these restrictions were punished. Men were forbidden to shave their beards and required to let them grow and keep them long according to the Taliban's liking, and to wear turbans outside their households. Communists were systematically executed. Prayer was made compulsory and those who did not respect the religious obligation after the azaan were arrested. Gambling was banned, and thieves were punished by amputating their hands or feet. In 2000, the Taliban leader Mullah Omar officially banned opium cultivation and drug trafficking in Afghanistan; the Taliban succeeded in nearly eradicating the majority of the opium production (99%) by 2001. Under the Taliban governance of Afghanistan, both drug users and dealers were severely prosecuted. The Afghan custom of bacha bazi, a form of pederastic sexual slavery and pedophilia traditionally practiced in various provinces of Afghanistan, was also forbidden under the six-year reign of the Taliban regime.

ss-180430-afghanistan-shah-marai-mn-12.jpg

(Women in Afghanistan under the Taliban would be deprived of all basic rights)

Cabinet ministers and deputies were mullahs with a "madrasah education". Several of them, such as the Minister of Health and Governor of the State bank, were primarily military commanders who were ready to leave their administrative posts to fight when needed. Military reverses that trapped them behind lines or led to their deaths increased the chaos in the national administration. At the national level, "all senior Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara bureaucrats" were replaced "with Pashtuns, whether qualified or not". Consequently, the ministries "by and large ceased to function". Rashid described the Taliban government as "a secret society run by Kandaharis ... mysterious, secretive, and dictatorial". They did not hold elections, as their spokesman explained:

The Sharia does not allow politics or political parties. That is why we give no salaries to officials or soldiers, just food, clothes, shoes, and weapons. We want to live a life like the Prophet lived 1400 years ago, and jihad is our right. We want to recreate the time of the Prophet, and we are only carrying out what the Afghan people have wanted for the past 14 years.

They modeled their decision-making process on the Pashtun tribal council (jirga), together with what they believed to be the early Islamic model. Discussion was followed by a building of a consensus by the "believers". Before capturing Kabul, there was talk of stepping aside once a government of "good Muslims" took power, and law and order were restored. As the Taliban's power grew, decisions were made by Mullah Omar without consulting the jirga and without consulting other parts of the country. One such instance is the rejection of Loya Jirga decision about expulsion of Osama bin Laden. Mullah Omar visited the capital, Kabul, only twice while in power. Instead of an election, their leader's legitimacy came from an oath of allegiance ("Bay'ah"), in imitation of the Prophet and the first four Caliphs. On 4 April 1996, Mullah Omar had "the Cloak of Muhammad" taken from its shrine, Kirka Sharif, for the first time in 60 years. Wrapping himself in the relic, he appeared on the roof of a building in the center of Kandahar while hundreds of Pashtun mullahs below shouted "Amir al-Mu'minin!" (Commander of the Faithful), in a pledge of support. Taliban spokesman Mullah Wakil explained:

Decisions are based on the advice of the Amir-ul Momineen. For us consultation is not necessary. We believe that this is in line with the Sharia. We abide by the Amir's view even if he alone takes this view. There will not be a head of state. Instead there will be an Amir al-Mu'minin. Mullah Omar will be the highest authority, and the government will not be able to implement any decision to which he does not agree. General elections are incompatible with Sharia and therefore we reject them.

The Taliban were very reluctant to share power, and since their ranks were overwhelmingly Pashtun they ruled as overlords over the 60% of Afghans from other ethnic groups. In local government, such as Kabul city council or Herat, Taliban loyalists, not locals, dominated, even when the Pashto-speaking Taliban could not communicate with the roughly half of the population who spoke Dari or other non-Pashtun tongues. Critics complained that this "lack of local representation in urban administration made the Taliban appear as an occupying force". Regarding its relations with the rest of the world, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan held a policy of isolationism: "The Taliban believe in non-interference in the affairs of other countries and similarly desire no outside interference in their country's internal affairs". Despite these isolationist policies, the Taliban entered in a deal for oil, electricity, and gas with Turkmenistan as part of the Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline. While initially maintaining a friendly relationship, relations between the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and Iran deteriorated in 1998 after Taliban forces seized the Iranian consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif and executed Iranian diplomats. Following this incident, Iran threatened to invade Afghanistan by massing up military forces near the Afghan border but intervention by the United Nations Security Council and the United States prevented the war. Turkmenistan adopted a position of "positive neutrality" and limited cooperation with the Taliban. China first initiated contact with the Taliban in 1998. In November 2000, China's then-ambassador to Pakistan, Lu Shulin, became the first senior representative of a non-Muslim country to meet with Mullah Omar.

Between 1996 and 2001, only three widely recognized countries; Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) declared the Islamic Emirate to be the rightful government of Afghanistan. The Taliban government additionally received support from Turkmenistan, though the country did not provide the Emirate with formal recognition. The Taliban government was not recognized by the United Nations, which instead continued to recognize the Islamic State of Afghanistan as being the legitimate government of Afghanistan. Following the declaration of a "War on Terror" by the United States after the September 11 attacks by al-Qaeda in 2001, international opposition to the Taliban regime running the Islamic Emirate drastically increased, and the only remaining diplomatic recognition by Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates was rescinded under growing pressure.

_115368850_gettyimages-1318325.jpg


The 2000 United States presidential election was the 54th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000. Republican candidate George W. Bush, the incumbent governor of Texas and eldest son of the 41st president, George H. W. Bush, won the election, defeating incumbent Vice President Al Gore. It was the fourth of five American presidential elections, and the first since 1888, in which the winning candidate lost the popular vote, and is considered one of the closest U.S. presidential elections, with long-standing controversy about the result. Gore conceded the election on December 13. Incumbent President Bill Clinton was ineligible to run for a third term due to presidential term limits, and Gore, the most recent incumbent vice president to run for president, secured the Democratic nomination with relative ease, defeating former U.S. Senator Bill Bradley in the primaries. Bush was seen as the early favorite for the Republican nomination, and after a contentious primary battle with U.S. Senator John McCain and others, secured the nomination by Super Tuesday. Bush chose former Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney as his running mate, while Gore chose U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman. Both major-party candidates focused primarily on domestic issues, such as the budget, tax relief, and reforms for federal social insurance programs, although foreign policy was not ignored. Due to President Bill Clinton's sex scandal with Monica Lewinsky and subsequent impeachment, Gore avoided campaigning with Clinton. Republicans denounced Clinton's indiscretions, while Gore criticized Bush's lack of experience. Nevertheless, relations with Russia were one of the major topics of the US presidential campaign. On the one hand, Al Gore advocated the continuation of Bill Clinton's policy toward Russia, while on the other, George W. Bush and the Republicans advocated a decidedly tougher policy toward Moscow, arguing that Clinton's misguided policy allowed Moscow to rebuild its potential and once again become a geopolitical adversary in Eurasia.

On election night, it was unclear who had won, with the electoral votes of the state of Florida still undecided. The returns showed that Bush had won Florida by such a close margin that state law required a recount. A month-long series of legal battles led to the highly controversial 5–4 Supreme Court decision Bush v. Gore, which ended the recount. The recount having been ended, Bush won Florida by 537 votes, a margin of 0.009%. The Florida recount and subsequent litigation resulted in major post-election controversy, and with speculative analysis suggesting that limited county-based recounts would likely have confirmed a Bush victory, whereas a statewide recount would likely have given the state to Gore. Ultimately, Bush won 271 electoral votes, one vote more than the 270-to-win majority, despite Gore receiving 543,895 more votes (a margin of 0.52% of all votes cast). Bush flipped 11 states that had voted Democratic in 1996: Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Tennessee and West Virginia.

On February 16, 2001, U.S. President George W. Bush ordered air strikes on five military targets near the Iraqi capital of Baghdad. The strikes came in response to imminent Iraqi threats to aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones. Many countries, including U.S. allies, have condemned the airstrikes, which they have called illegal. The U.S. military said the bombing was essentially a self-defense operation. It was President Bush's first military action since taking office. U.S. and British officials base the no-fly zones on UN Security Council Resolution 688, which demands that Iraq end the oppression of its population, and on the ceasefire agreement after the Gulf War that prevent Iraq from interfering in allied air operations over Iraq. Iraq described the act as an "aggression and a unilateral use of force against the sovereignty of an independent state." A Kuwaiti official said his country "neither permits nor condemns the strikes". Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey have expressed levels of opposition to the bombing. The U.S. president, speaking from Mexico during a meeting with President Vicente Fox, described the bombing as a "routine mission to enforce the no-fly zone". "It was a task that I was informed of and authorized, but I repeat, it's a routine mission." In London, British Prime Minister Tony Blair's office said Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon authorized the raids earlier this week after discussions with the United States.

641a135c956507001988e16f.jpg

(The Hainan Island incident was President Bush's first but not the last international crisis)

The Hainan Island incident occurred on March 1, 2001, when a United States Navy EP-3E ARIES II signals intelligence aircraft and a Chinese J-8II interceptor jet collided in mid-air, resulting in an international dispute between the United States and China (PRC). The EP-3 was operating about 70 miles (110 km) away from the PRC island province of Hainan, as well as about 100 miles (160 km) away from the China military installation in the Paracel Islands, when it was intercepted by two J-8 fighters. A collision between the EP-3 and one of the J-8s caused a PRC pilot to go missing (later presumed dead); the EP-3 was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan without approved permission from the Chinese authorities. The 24 crew members were detained and interrogated by Chinese authorities until a statement was delivered by the United States government regarding the incident. The exact phrasing of this document was intentionally ambiguous and allowed both countries to save face while defusing a potentially volatile situation between the United States and the People's Republic of China. The crew of the EP-3 was released on April 11, 2001, and returned to their base at Whidbey Island via Honolulu, Hawaii, where they were subject to two days of debriefings. The pilot, Lt. Shane Osborn, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for "heroism and extraordinary achievement" in flight. The J-8B pilot, Wang Wei, was posthumously honored in China as a "Guardian of Territorial Airspace and Waters". His widow received a personal letter of condolence from President George W. Bush.

U.S. Navy engineers said the EP-3 could be repaired in 8–12 months, but China refused to allow it to be flown off Hainan island. The disassembled aircraft was released on July 3, 2001, and was returned to the United States by the Russian airline Polet in two Antonov An-124 Ruslans. The repairs were performed at Lockheed Martin in Marietta, Georgia, for reassembly and to make it flightworthy again. The aircraft was then flown to L3 in Waco, Texas, for missionization as they were the main provider of EP-3 maintenance and modernization at the time. The aircraft returned to duty prior to 2013. In addition to paying for the dismantling and shipping of the EP-3, the United States paid for the 11 days of food and lodging supplied by the Chinese government to the aircraft's crew, in the amount of $34,567. The Chinese had demanded one million dollars compensation from the U.S. for the lost J-8 and their pilot, but this was refused and no further negotiations were performed. The incident occurred six weeks after the inauguration of George W. Bush as president and was his first foreign policy crisis. Both sides were criticized after the event; the Chinese for making a bluff which was called without any real concessions from the American side other than the "Letter of the two sorries", and the U.S. first for being insensitive immediately after the event and later for issuing the letter rather than being more oppositional. The United States tried to be conciliatory in order to try to avoid Chinese objections to U.S. foreign policy, which became more important after the September 11 attacks and the beginning of the War on Terror.

On 13 March 2001, George W. Bush gave the Union State notice of the United States' withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, in accordance with the clause that required six months' notice before terminating the pact—the first time in recent history that the United States has withdrawn from a major international arms treaty. This led to the eventual creation of the American Missile Defense Agency. Supporters of the withdrawal argued that it was a necessity in order to test and build a limited National Missile Defense to protect the United States from nuclear blackmail by a rogue state. But, the withdrawal had many foreign and domestic critics, who said the construction of a missile defense system would lead to fears of a U.S. nuclear first strike, as the missile defense could blunt the retaliatory strike that would otherwise deter such a preemptive attack. John Rhinelander, a negotiator of the ABM treaty, predicted that the withdrawal would be a "fatal blow" to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and would lead to a "world without effective legal constraints on nuclear proliferation". Former U.S. Secretary of Defense William Perry also criticized the U.S. withdrawal as a very bad decision. Additionally, in March 2001, the Bush Administration announced that it would not implement the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty signed in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan that would require nations to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, claiming that ratifying the treaty would create economic setbacks in the U.S. and does not put enough pressure to limit emissions from developing nations. In February 2002, Bush announced his alternative to the Kyoto Protocol, by bringing forth a plan to reduce the intensity of greenhouse gases by 18 percent over 10 years. The intensity of greenhouse gases specifically is the ratio of greenhouse gas emissions and economic output, meaning that under this plan, emissions would still continue to grow, but at a slower pace. Bush stated that this plan would prevent the release of 500 million metric tons of greenhouse gases, which is about the equivalent of 70 million cars from the road. This target would achieve this goal by providing tax credits to businesses that use renewable energy sources.


1474C07C-FF98-485D-9174-D68E59AA6FD5_cx0_cy10_cw0_w1080_h608.jpg

(Kursk nuclear-powered submarine)

On the morning of 18 March 2000, the nuclear-powered Project 949A Antey (Oscar II class) submarine K-141 Kursk, participated in the "Spring-X" exercise, which was a large-scale naval exercise planned by the Union Navy, which consisted of 40 ships and five submarines. Kursk had recently won a citation for its excellent performance and been recognised as having the best submarine crew in the Northern Fleet. Although this was an exercise, Kursk loaded a full complement of conventional combat weapons. It was one of the few submarines authorised to carry a combat load at all times. This included 18 RPK-6 Vodopad/RPK-7 Veter (SS-N-16 "Stallion") antisubmarine missiles and 24 P-700 Granit (SS-N-19 "Shipwreck") cruise missiles, which were designed to defeat the best naval air defences. Kursk had mythic standing. It was reputedly unsinkable and, it was claimed, could withstand a direct hit from a torpedo. The outer hull was constructed using 8 mm (0.3 in) steel plate covered by up to 80 mm (3 in) of rubber, which minimised other submarines' or surface vessels' ability to detect the submarine. The inner pressure hull was made of high-quality 50 mm (2 in) steel plate. The two hulls were separated by a 1-to-2 m (3-to-7 ft) gap. The inner hull was divided into nine water-tight compartments. The boat was 155 m (509 ft), about as long as two jumbo jets.

At 08:51 local time, Kursk requested permission to conduct a torpedo training launch and received the response "Dobro" ("Good"). After considerable delay, the submarine was set to fire two dummy torpedoes at the Kirov-class battlecruiser Pyotr Velikiy. At 11:29 local time, the torpedo room crew loaded the first practice Type 65 "Kit" torpedo, without a warhead, into Kursk's number-4 torpedo tube on the starboard side. It was 10.7 m (35 ft) long and weighed 5 t (4.9 long tons; 5.5 short tons) At 11:29:34 (07:29:34 GMT), seismic detectors at the Norwegian seismic array (NORSAR) and in other locations around the world recorded a seismic event of magnitude 1.5 on the Richter scale. The location was fixed at coordinates 69°38′N 37°19′E, north-east of Murmansk, approximately 250 km (160 mi) from Norway, and 80 km (50 mi) from the Kola Peninsula. At 11:31:48, 2 minutes and 14 seconds after the first, a second event, measuring 4.2 on the Richter scale, or 250 times larger than the first, was registered on seismographs across northern Europe and was detected as far away as Alaska. The second explosion was equivalent to 2–3 tons of TNT. The seismic data showed that the explosion occurred at the same depth as the sea bed.The seismic event, triangulated at 69°36.99′N 37°34.50′E, showed that the boat had moved about 400 m (1,300 ft) from the site of the initial explosion. It was enough time for the submarine to sink to a depth of 108 m (354 ft) and remain on the sea floor for a short period.

The crew of the submarine Karelia detected the explosion, but the captain assumed that it was part of the exercise. Aboard Pyotr Velikiy, the target of the practice launch, the crew detected a hydroacoustic signal characteristic of an underwater explosion and felt their hull shudder. They reported the phenomenon to fleet headquarters but their report was ignored. The schedule for Kursk to complete the practice torpedo firing expired at 13:30 without any contact from the sub. Accustomed to the frequent failure of communications equipment, Fleet Commander Admiral Vyacheslav Alekseyevich Popov, aboard Pyotr Velikiy, was not initially alarmed. The ship dispatched a helicopter to look for Kursk, but it was unable to locate the sub on the surface; this was reported to Popov.

The Northern Fleet duty officer notified the head of the fleet's search and rescue forces, Captain Alexander Teslenko, to stand by for orders. Teslenko's primary rescue ship was a 20-year-old former lumber carrier, Mikhail Rudnitsky, which had been converted to support submersible rescue operations. Teslenko notified the ship's captain to be ready to depart on one hour's notice. Berthed at the primary Northern Fleet base at Severomorsk, the ship was equipped with two AS-32 and AS-34 Priz-class deep-submergence rescue vehicles, a diving bell, underwater video cameras, lifting cranes, and other specialised gear, but it was not equipped with stabilisers capable of keeping the vessel in position during stormy weather and could lower its rescue vessels only in calm seas. The Russian Navy had previously operated two India-class submarines, each of which carried a pair of Poseidon-class DSRVs that could reach a depth of 693 m (2,270 ft), but due to a lack of funds, the vessels had been held since 1994 in a Saint Petersburg yard for pending repairs. At 17:00, an Ilyushin Il-38 aircraft was dispatched. The crew spent three hours unsuccessfully searching for Kursk. At 18:00, more than six hours after the initial explosion, Kursk failed to complete a scheduled communication check. The Northern Fleet command became concerned and tried to contact the boat. After repeated failures, at 18:30, they began a search-and-rescue operation, dispatching additional aircraft to locate the submarine, which again failed to locate the boat on the surface. At 22:30, the Northern Fleet declared an emergency, and the exercise was stopped. Between 15 and 22 vessels of the Northern Fleet, including about 3,000 sailors, began searching for the submarine. The Mikhail Rudnitsky left port at 00:30.

At 04:50 on Sunday, 19 March, personnel aboard Pyotr Velikiy detected two anomalies on the seabed that might be the boat. At 09:00, Mikhail Rudnitsky arrived at the location. While setting anchor, its crew interpreted an acoustic sound as an SOS from the submarine, but soon concluded the noise had been produced by the anchor chain striking the anchor hole. At 11:30, Mikhail Rudnitsky prepared to lower the AS-34, which entered the water at 17:30. At 18:30, at a depth of 100 m (300 ft) and at a speed of 2 kn (3.7 km/h), the AS-34 reported colliding with an object, and through a porthole, the crew saw the Kursk's propeller and stern stabiliser. With the AS-34 damaged by the collision and forced to surface, the crew of Mikhail Rudnitsky began preparing the AS-32 for operation. At 22:40, the AS-32 entered the water and began searching for Kursk. It was unable to locate the submarine, because it had been given an incorrect heading by personnel aboard Pyotr Velikiy. Crew aboard Mikhail Rudnitsky tried to contact Kursk and briefly thought they heard an acoustic SOS signal, but this was determined to be of biological origin. They reported the sounds to Pyotr Velikiy. The AS-32 returned to the surface at 01:00 on Monday morning, 20 March. The salvage tug Nikolay Chiker (SB 131) arrived early in the rescue operation. Using deep-water camera equipment, it obtained the first images of the wrecked submarine, which showed severe damage from the sub's bow to its sail. Kursk was listing at a 25-degree angle and down 5–7 degrees by the bow. The bow had ploughed about 22 m (72 ft) deep into the clay seabed, at a depth of 108 m (354 ft). The periscope was raised, indicating that the accident occurred when the submarine was at a depth of less than 20 m (66 ft). The AS-34 was repaired and was launched at 05:00 on Monday. At 06:50, the AS-34 located Kursk and unsuccessfully tried to attach to the aft escape trunk over Kursk's ninth compartment. Unable to create the vacuum seal necessary to attach to the escape trunk, its batteries were quickly depleted and the crew was forced to surface. No spare batteries were available, so the crew was forced to wait while the batteries were recharged. Meanwhile, winds increased, blowing 10–12 m/s (19–23 kn) to 15–27 m/s (29–52 kn), and the waves rose to 3–4 points (4–8 ft; 1.2–2.4 m), forcing the Russians to suspend rescue operations.

In other news, the Union State submitted a bid to host UEFA Euro 2008 football tournament. Seven bids representing thirteen countries had been submitted:

1. Austria–Switzerland (joint bid)
2. Bosnia and Herzegovina–Croatia-Slovenia (joint bid)
3. Greece–Turkey (joint bid)
4. Denmark–Finland–Norway–Sweden (joint bid titled Nordic 2008)
5. Hungary
6. Union State
7. Scotland–Republic of Ireland (joint bid)
 
Last edited:
1. Following the failed Russian attempts to rescue the crew of Kursk, the British government, along with France, Germany, Israel, Italy, and Norway, offered help. With the Western help, the crew will be rescued, but at the same time NATO will gain open access to Russia's vital military technology.
A) Agree to the Western help - the crew's lives are most important;
B) Don't agree to the Western help - the technology is much more important.

2. Following the canonization of the Romanov Imperial family, nationalists and other right-wing groups organized a large scale demonstrations in Russia, demanding from the government the same compensation to the Romanov family for all the Soviet crimes done to them, which was made earlier by the Russian government to the Russian Orthodox Church.
A) Agree to pay the compensation;
B) Don't agree to pay the compensation.

3. Should Wide is My Motherland became a new anthem of the Union State?
A) Yes;
B) Yes, but with updated lyrics;
C) No.


4. President Lukashenko and Director Putin have decided to begin an anti-atom campaign in the West, to force Europe and America into a dependence on import of Russian gas, oil and coal. Please write down, how should the anti-atom campaign in the West be organized by the Russian government?

5. The term BRIC was originally developed in the context of foreign investment strategies. It was introduced in the 2001 publication, Building Better Global Economic BRICs by then-chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill. Please write down, how should be future BRICS organization, including Brazil, Union State, India, China and South Africa be organized and established?
 
Last edited:
Members of Russian-led factions (2001)
1. Commonwealth of Independent States - Union State, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Transnistria, Gaguazia, Armenia, Georgia;

2. Commonwealth of Independent States Free Trade Area - Union State, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Transnistria, Gaguazia, Armenia, Georgia;

3. Eurasian Economic Union - Union State, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Transnistria, Gaguazia, Armenia, Georgia, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia;

4. Eurasian Customs Union - Union State, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Transnistria, Gaguazia, Armenia, Georgia, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia

5. Collective Security Treaty Organization - Union State, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Transnistria, Gaguazia, Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia.

6. BRICS - Brazil, Union State, India, China, South Africa.
 
Last edited:
1. Following the failed Russian attempts to rescue the crew of Kursk, the British government, along with France, Germany, Israel, Italy, and Norway, offered help. With the Western help, the crew will be rescued, but at the same time NATO will gain open access to Russia's vital military technology.
A) Agree to the Western help - the crew's lives are most important;
B) Don't agree to the Western help - the technology is much more important.

2. Following the canonization of the Romanov Imperial family, nationalists and other right-wing groups organized a large scale demonstrations in Russia, demanding from the government the same compensation to the Romanov family for all the Soviet crimes done to them, which was made earlier by the Russian government to the Russian Orthodox Church.
A) Agree to pay the compensation;
B) Don't agree to pay the compensation.

3. Should Wide is My Motherland became a new anthem of the Union State?
A) Yes;
B) Yes, but with updated lyrics;
C) No.


4. President Lukashenko and Director Putin have decided to begin an anti-atom campaign in the West, to force Europe and America into a dependence on import of Russian gas, oil and coal. Please write down, how should the anti-atom campaign in the West be organized by the Russian government?

5. The term BUIC was originally developed in the context of foreign investment strategies. It was introduced in the 2001 publication, Building Better Global Economic BUICs by then-chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill. Please write down, how should be future BUICS organization, including Brazil, Union State, India, China and South Africa be organized and established?
1) A. We should agree to western help and save the lives of our crew. Maybe try to limit which countries get to help but that's it. We ought to not sacrifice the lives of Russian servicemen.

2) B. No compensation, we own them nothing. When you bite your people they will bite you back.

3) Anything but the traditional Soviet Anthem with the lyrics modified for the Union State would be a shame. I'm not exagerating when I say its the best national anthem out there, and it plays well into remembering the Great Patriotic War. The song you presented is very weak in comparison. So I would go with a hard no. C

5) If anything, we need to create the BRICS Developement Bank earlier, considering it's the main substance behind the organization. The long term goal of the BRICS should be placed towards what is becoming a reality OTL today: building a large coalition of revisionist third world countries. This plays well into the Russian agenda, even if Brazil and South Africa won't be very thrilled.
 
Last edited:
1. Following the failed Russian attempts to rescue the crew of Kursk, the British government, along with France, Germany, Israel, Italy, and Norway, offered help. With the Western help, the crew will be rescued, but at the same time NATO will gain open access to Russia's vital military technology.
A) Agree to the Western help - the crew's lives are most important;
B) Don't agree to the Western help - the technology is much more important.

2. Following the canonization of the Romanov Imperial family, nationalists and other right-wing groups organized a large scale demonstrations in Russia, demanding from the government the same compensation to the Romanov family for all the Soviet crimes done to them, which was made earlier by the Russian government to the Russian Orthodox Church.
A) Agree to pay the compensation;
B) Don't agree to pay the compensation.

3. Should Wide is My Motherland became a new anthem of the Union State?
A) Yes;
B) Yes, but with updated lyrics;
C) No.


4. President Lukashenko and Director Putin have decided to begin an anti-atom campaign in the West, to force Europe and America into a dependence on import of Russian gas, oil and coal. Please write down, how should the anti-atom campaign in the West be organized by the Russian government?

5. The term BUIC was originally developed in the context of foreign investment strategies. It was introduced in the 2001 publication, Building Better Global Economic BUICs by then-chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill. Please write down, how should be future BUICS organization, including Brazil, Union State, India, China and South Africa be organized and established?
1. A
2. A
3. B
4-5. I support mixed of @Kriss and @Matador de Lagartos plan
 
Last edited:
1. Following the failed Russian attempts to rescue the crew of Kursk, the British government, along with France, Germany, Israel, Italy, and Norway, offered help. With the Western help, the crew will be rescued, but at the same time NATO will gain open access to Russia's vital military technology.

B) Don't agree to the Western help - the technology is much more important. But be sure to ordain them as heroes and to compensate their families properly.

Sometimes sacrifices need to be made and we cannot allow for our technology to fall to Western hands. Our brave sailor's knew what were the costs of their duties.

5. The term BUIC was originally developed in the context of foreign investment strategies. It was introduced in the 2001 publication, Building Better Global Economic BUICs by then-chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill. Please write down, how should be future BUICS organization, including Brazil, Union State, India, China and South Africa be organized and established?

Honestly i cannot get used to BUIC ,i know that name of the State is Union State, but i always assumed full name is Union State of Russia and Belarus and honestly in popular culture it is probably referred to as Russia because it is Russia, in same way as UK is referred to as the British.

For the question itself?

I would say that it should start off as lose economic forum where member state's should seek for way to enhance their economic cooperation, resolve their economic disputes and discuss potentially setting up common institutions to help each other's development as well as development of developing countries.

Generally i believe that we shouldn't try to go to strong as such diverse group needs time to build trust and we still need to keep lay low . If we decide for more centralized approach we could put off other members.
6. BUICS - Brazil, Union State, India, China, South Africa.
Also South Africa joined later , so it should be BUIC.

2. Following the canonization of the Romanov Imperial family, nationalists and other right-wing groups organized a large scale demonstrations in Russia, demanding from the government the same compensation to the Romanov family for all the Soviet crimes done to them, which was made earlier by the Russian government to the Russian Orthodox Church.

What's popular is popular, so ...

A) Agree to pay the compensation;

We need to come to terms with our past.

3. Should Wide is My Motherland (
) became a new anthem of the Union State?

C) No keep the current anthem.

4. President Lukashenko and Director Putin have decided to begin an anti-atom campaign in the West, to force Europe and America into a dependence on import of Russian gas, oil and coal. Please write down, how should the anti-atom campaign in the West be organized by the Russian government?

Support Pro environmental nongovernment groups as well as Green parties, promote anty Atomic propaganda and movies/documentaries to raise awareness against Atomic energy.
 
GDP Ranking (2001)
1. United States - $11,081,900M
2. Japan - $4,774, 710M
3. Germany - $2,485,800M
4. United Kingdom - $1,949,080M
5. France - $1,707,670M
6. China - $1,693,650M
7. Italy - $1,468, 030M
8. Union State - $1,193,475M
9. Canada - $858,968M
10. Mexico - $836,055M
11. Spain - $707,384M
12. South Korea - $637,730M
13. India - $593,953M
14. Brazil - $579,982M
15. Netherlands - $531,490M
 
1. United States - $11,081,900M
2. Japan - $4,774, 710M
3. Germany - $2,485,800M
4. United Kingdom - $1,949,080M
5. France - $1,707,670M
6. China - $1,693,650M
7. Italy - $1,468, 030M
8. Union State - $1,193,475M
9. Canada - $858,968M
10. Mexico - $836,055M
11. Spain - $707,384M
12. South Korea - $637,730M
13. India - $593,953M
14. Brazil - $579,982M
15. Netherlands - $531,490M

Nice, we are catching up.
 
1.a
1.a
3.c
4.Actively spread information across the internet and other minor avenues like independent radio shows, talks shows and the like to gain sympathy and push an anti-establishment angle making it harder to disprove. Also try to push a pro-worker message within said information to gain the support of the working class. Also if possible try to gain our own forms of alternative power since we do not wish to be left behind or at least update power generation across Russia.
 
Honestly i cannot get used to BUIC ,i know that name of the State is Union State, but i always assumed full name is Union State of Russia and Belarus and honestly in popular culture it is probably referred to as Russia because it is Russia, in same way as UK is referred to as the British.
Ok, I will change back to BRICS
 
Nice, we are catching up.
I would say that is a historic moment, as after many decades China overtook Italy in nominal GDP. Nevertheless, the 00s and 10s will be dominated by economic growth and expansion of 3 states: China, Russia and Germany, which will bring many geopolitical repercussions.
 
I would say that is a historic moment, as after many decades China overtook Italy in nominal GDP. Nevertheless, the 00s and 10s will be dominated by economic growth and expansion of 3 states: China, Russia and Germany, which will bring many geopolitical repercussions.

Honestly as long as Germany mantains coordinal relations with more prosperous and developed Russia it should mantain its economic growth in upcoming decades.
 
Top