Chapter 1: How Liberty Survives
Chapter 1: How Liberty Survives

“On the 9th of April, 1925, the retired German Admiral, Alfred Peter Friedrich von Tirpitz visited the home of Paul von Hindenburg. In the last week, there had been a tumult amongst the German right; no party had been able to gain the majority needed in the first round of German elections, and a second round had been called. The right had nearly unanimously nominated their candidate, Karl Jarres, from the ‘German People’s Party’. However, for Tirpitz, Jarres was not an acceptable candidate.

Tirpitz was part of a group known as the ‘German Fatherland Party’, which advocated for ‘People’s emperors’ of a military government; they had a great distaste for the republic and the Weimar coalition and had even proposed a coup against it as an acceptable way to achieve their militaristic goals. They proposed the former Generalfeldmarschall Ludendorf take on their perceived role of a military ‘Führer’. However, Ludendorf and his own ‘National Völkisch Freedom Party’ had lost spectacularly in the first round of elections that year, coming below even their hated enemy; the Communists. With the second round of elections approaching and the ‘Weimar Coalition’ candidate Wilhelm Marx gaining an almost clear plurality of votes among the population, Tirpitz sought out the retired Generalfeldmarschall Hindenburg, alongside a young leader of the agrarian nobility to convince him to run.

Very few know what was actually said or spoken at the meeting between Tirpitz and Hindenburg. Some have speculated that Tirpitz had unintentionally (or perhaps even intentionally given the assertive and strongman personality of the German nationalist) offended Hindenburg in some way, perhaps pushing far too hard with his dream of a militarist Germany reborn under Hindenburg. But what is known is that Tirpitz and his ally from the nobility left Hindenburg's house only hours later, unsuccessful in their endeavor.

It’s unknown what Hindenburg may have done had he actually run, his popularity among the German right wing being up in the air at best. Some speculate he really would’ve ushered in the militaristic kind of rulership given his personal positions as well as his tentative support for Alfred Hugenberg in 1931. Hindenburg's hypothetical presidency remains a topic of much debate, especially considering the latter years of his term, 1929-1932, would be some of the most defining and tumultuous in the history of the Weimar Republic, as they almost led to the failure of the entire democratic experiment in Germany in our own time.”

- Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


“Both Jarres and Marx were not wildly different candidates in of themselves. Jarres himself would drift increasingly to the center-right over the course of his presidency, in lock-step with his fellow party members. However, it was all the same an unexpected victory for the German right wing. The years following his election and before the Great Depression were known in the Weimar Republic as Goldene Zwanziger which featured a growing economy and a subsequent decrease in civil discontent. Although this golden age would be only a brief respite in the Republic’s woes. Still, it was an important stepping stone for the German Republic, had Jarres, under the counsel of moderate-minded members of his party like Gustav Streseman, not taken serious precautions to protect German democracy, the German Constitutional Crisis would have certainly been far worse.”

- The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, David Schmidt


“Any democracy that allows its leader to act with complete impunity and disregard for any due processes, sets up its own inevitable failure.”

- Extract from Gustav Stresemann's speech to the German Reichstag calling for the limitation of Article 48, June 3rd, 1928
 
Last edited:
YESSSS, finally ... a TL featuring the most probabale instead-of-Hindenburg presidential candidate of 1925 👍
 
Chapter 1: How Liberty Survives

“On the 9th of April, 1925, the retired German Admiral, Alfred Peter Friedrich von Tirpitz visited the home of Paul von Hindenburg. In the last week, there had been a tumult amongst the German right; no party had been able to gain the majority needed in the first round of German elections, and a second round had been called. The right had nearly unanimously nominated their candidate, Karl Jarres, from the ‘German People’s Party’. However, for Tirpitz, Jarres was not an acceptable candidate.

Tirpitz was part of a group known as the ‘German Fatherland Party’, which advocated for ‘People’s emperors’ of a military government; they had a great distaste for the republic and the Weimar coalition and had even proposed a coup against it as an acceptable way to achieve their militaristic goals. They proposed the former Generalfeldmarschall Ludendorf take on their perceived role of a military ‘Führer’. However, Ludendorf and his own ‘National Völkisch Freedom Party’ had lost spectacularly in the first round of elections that year, coming below even their hated enemy; the Communists. With the second round of elections approaching and the ‘Weimar Coalition’ candidate Wilhelm Marx gaining an almost clear plurality of votes among the population, Tirpitz sought out the retired Generalfeldmarschall Hindenburg, alongside a young leader of the agrarian nobility to convince him to run.

Very few know what was actually said or spoken at the meeting between Tirpitz and Hindenburg. Some have speculated that Tirpitz had unintentionally (or perhaps even intentionally given the assertive and strongman personality of the German nationalist) offended Hindenburg in some way, perhaps pushing far too hard with his dream of a militarist Germany reborn under Hindenburg. But what is known is that Tirpitz and his ally from the nobility left Hindenburg's house only hours later, unsuccessful in their endeavor.

It’s unknown what Hindenburg may have done had he actually run, his popularity among the German right wing being up in the air at best. Some speculate he really would’ve ushered in the militaristic kind of rulership given his personal positions as well as his backing for Franz Von Papen in 1931. Hindenburg's hypothetical presidency remains a topic of much debate, especially considering the latter years of his term, 1929-1932, would be some of the most defining and tumultuous in the history of the Weimar Republic, as they almost led to the failure of the entire democratic experiment in Germany in our own time.”

- Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


“Both Jarres and Marx were not wildly different candidates in of themselves. Jarres himself would drift increasingly to the center-right over the course of his presidency, in lock-step with his fellow party members. However, it was all the same an unexpected victory for the German right wing. The years following his election and before the Great Depression were known in the Weimar Republic as Goldene Zwanziger which featured a growing economy and a subsequent decrease in civil discontent. Although this golden age would be only a brief respite in the Republic’s woes. Still, it was an important stepping stone for the German Republic, had Jarres, under the counsel of moderate-minded members of his party like Gustav Streseman, not taken serious precautions to protect German democracy, the German Constitutional Crisis would have certainly been far worse.”

- The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, David Schmidt


“Any democracy that allows its leader to act with complete impunity and disregard for any due processes, sets up its own inevitable failure.”

- Extract from Karl Jarres’ speech to the German Reichstag calling for the suspension of Article 48, June 3rd, 1928
Out of curiosity, how come Jarres wins the election as opposed to Marx?
 
Out of curiosity, how come Jarres wins the election as opposed to Marx?
  1. He was already first well ahed of every other candidate in the first ballot
  2. He was much more popular than rather ... 'dry' administrative-only-type Marx. He was for Duisburg what Adenauer was for Köln: a rather 'legendary' Mayor.
  3. He would ably take Hindenburgs place in gaining votes in the 2nd ballot. ... being by hinself a much more able campaigner than Hindenburg
  4. By making the behind-curtain deal between Zentrum and SPD - Marx for President and Braun for ministerpresident in Prussia, both actually wanted the latter job for themself - even more public as an example for how 'leftish politics' are made against the populace but for their parties own welfare only. ;)
 
Out of curiosity, how come Jarres wins the election as opposed to Marx?
Tbh, I could only find so much information on either one. While Marx was interesting in his own right, I didn't see much difference between the two. Leading to the quote you see in the excerpts in the thread. Jarres also led polls in the first round of elections, while Marx slagged behind and was only pushed forward as the Weimar Coalitions candidate seemingly because no one else wanted the job. Jarres on the other hand appears far more charismatic in my opinion, and having Jarres, a member of a traditionally more right-wing party, win and then not tow the line with the increasingly radical right makes more sense in the context of building tensions leading up to the preceding events of 1930.
 
Chapter 2: A Black Weekend
Chapter 2: A Black Weekend

“By 1930, production in almost every country, bar Soviet Russia, had collapsed. Falling by some 40% in the worst cases like Germany and America. With factories from the Ruhr steel mills to the Detroit car plants shuttered, entire armies of unemployed workers flooded the streets of major cities. 8 million men and women in America, another 2.5 million in Britain, and 5 million more in Germany.

These loitering gangs of workless and wageless youths walked the lengths of their cities, and for each street corner they turned, it seemed they were joined by another score of people who had just been put out of work as the depression spread like a plague across the West. With no possible way to pay rent or afford housing; grim-looking shanty towns popped up like ghosts out of the grave on the outskirts of towns, encampments of suitcases and scrap metal with maybe a single blanket between a whole family used for the roof. It’s no surprise living under these conditions that the natural progression of the crisis would lead from hopelessness to violence and revolt.

There were food riots that broke out in America, especially in the central and south-west, Britain saw a massive miner's strike, and Berlin was quickly racing towards a city-wide civil war in its streets as militias clad in brown shirts and flying red banners clashed with police.

The 'Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei' (NSDAP)–or 'Nazis'–fed like vultures on the mass hysteria of the German population, playing up their frustrations with the government to net themselves massive gains in the Reichstag and accelerating the party from fringe right-wing groups to one of the largest single political parties in Germany. Of course, it was not only the government the Nazis went after, but they also attacked the Entente powers, the Communists, the Socialists, the Gypsies [1], and most of all, the Jews. Violence in Berlin became a daily norm. So it is no surprise that as the depression effects began to explode in coups across the globe, from Portugal to Brazil, Argentina, Peru, and Spain, the same fate would befall Germany.”

- Lords of Finance, by Liaquat Ahamed [2]


“In the course of history, it is hard to argue the actions of one person can be so influential; most often, multiple factors are at play when anything happens in history. However, there is a case to be made, that at the heart of the origins of the German Constitutional Crisis was one man, Heinrich Brüning.

Brüning is somewhat seen as the German equivalent to Herbert Hoover in America. He was a conservative with a staunch aversion to any policies he saw as ‘socialist’ in nature, which, while in a time of economic prosperity like only a year or two before would have been admirable and even preferable during a global depression, it was decidedly not. Initially, Brüning’s policies found some support given his financial and economic acumen. But it quickly melted away as the measures he instituted seemed to only accelerate the effects of the depression. Brüning’s policies were so unsuccessful that the Reichstag repealed them after a month. In response to this, Brüning attempted to have his policies pushed into action by way of ‘Notverordnung’, or emergency decree. This power, however, was vested only in the President himself, and after witnessing Brüning’s repeated failures decided to have him removed from the position of chancellor.

Brünings cabinet didn’t even last a year yet it completely eroded faith in the government, and the economic downturn he caused only increased the radicalism and popularity of parties like the Nazis and DNVP. He left the Reichstag as a government practically at war with itself, many right-wing parties called for Jarres to dissolve the government and hold new elections. However, rightly fearing the rising popularity of the Nazis in reaction to Brüning's actions, Jarres refused and instead appointed the new Chancellor, Otto Wels a part of the SPD. At the time the SPD was still the largest party and yet had to nonetheless rule by a coalition in the Reichstag. Wels’ cabinet encompassed many of the SPD’s previous allies like the DDP, DVP, and Centre parties. However notably excluded the second-largest party in the Reichstag, the DNVP. The DNVP had undergone a very radical shift under its new chairman Alfred Hugenburg, a hardline defender of the Nazis. He had refused to support Brüning's cabinet, and Brüning's removal and public disgrace led him to believe that new elections would hail in the return of his party to prominence. He was especially displeased when Jarres refused to acquiesce and instead appointed a socialist to the chancellorship. Hugenburg expressed his discontent in a speech to the Reichstag only days after Wels’ appointment and stated his demands that the new elections be called or the DNVP would walk out on the government. Both Wels and Jarres attempted to negotiate with Hugenburg, but the DNVP refused to hear them out, finally not wanting to lose face by an entire party walking out on the Reichstag; Jarres caved and had the government dissolved and new elections called.

It is disputed whether Hugenburg would have actually walked out had the new elections not been called. He could’ve still just as easily used the staunchness of Wels and Jarres as justification to initiate the crisis regardless. But the calling of new elections certainly made it easier for what came next.”

- The Years of Anarchy: Germany from 1929-1932, David Schmidt


“Those autocrats in sheep's clothes who have for ten years ruled the Republic of Weimar, have pressed their boots on the neck of the German Volk for ten years too long! Today Germany will be reborn and take its rightful place among the great nations in the world!”

- Excerpt from Alfred Hugenberg’s speech to the Reichstag, September 21st, 1930


“On the morning of the 21st of September, 1930, the citizens of Berlin awoke to the sound of gunshots in the streets. Hours earlier, Alfred Hugenburg of the DNVP had called his party along with the armed paramilitary of ‘Der Stahlhelm’ and other groups of the nationalistic ‘Pan-German League’ to a rally, where he proclaimed to the gathered parties the results of the German federal elections that had been held a day prior. He announced the League had swept the elections but that the President was planning to suppress the results and remove them from the Reichstag. Thus, he called upon the League to pass a vote of impeachment against the President and take forcible hold of the German government. The German Constitutional Crisis had begun.

The Pan-German Leagues paramilitary forces went on the warpath as they paraded through the streets of Berlin and marched up to the Reichstag, weapons in hand. Once there, the ministers of the ‘Neue Deutsche Regierung’ assembled in the Reichstag and held a trial in absentia with the unanimous decision to impeach President Karl Jarres. The new government then declared the acting chancellor, Alfred Hugenburg, to become the acting president and enact Article 48 of the constitution. The new government then announced the banning of ‘anti-German’ parties like the KPD and the Weimar Coalition and demanded the party headquarters be shut down. In some states, there was immediate compliance with the order, and party headquarters, especially in Pomerania, Ostprussia, and Bavaria, were shut down by the police. However, many did not comply, not least because of the limitations to Article 48 which Jarres' government and party had conveniently put in place only a short while prior.

In the democratic stronghold of the Prussian Free State, the police not only did not comply with the order by the new government, but they immediately mobilized across the state to try and get the situation under control. It was specifically because the Prussian police defied the government's new orders that Karl Jarres was not beaten to death by a nationalist mob that arrived at his residence only a mere ten minutes after police had come to his home to inform him of the coup. However many others were not as lucky, and many politicians had their doors kicked in by the nationalist paramilitaries that day. The Prussian police acted quickly to save the President and by the time the Pan-German League had been informed Jarres was nowhere to be found, the German president was in Brandenburg, an hour from Berlin.

Jarres was quick to action, one of the officers who had been escorting him out of Berlin said of the man, quote; “He was off like a shot from the moment he set foot to pavement.” Jarres, along with what ministers in his company had been rescued, sought out the nearest radio station from which they could broadcast to the German people. However, the Pan-German League had a force of paramilitaries in the city and the cabinet was forced to relocate to Magdeburg, which the German police had managed to lock down with the help of the local populace. From there, the cabinet went on air to declare the new government as illegitimate and unconstitutional, with the Minister-President of the Prussian free state, Otto Braun, alongside Jarres, bringing forward the actual results of the election, which had come in just before the crisis began. The SPD had won overwhelmingly in Prussia, and while the DNVP had won Pomerania, they had lost major battlegrounds in districts like Ostprussia to the NSDAP. The release of the electoral results from Prussia caused the New German Government's legitimacy to begin to crumble. Multiple other states began releasing their own electoral results, all of which clearly showed the DNVP and Pan-German League losing the election overwhelmingly. Even the KPD came to the side of Jarres’ government and called for a national strike against the government. With their authority up in the air, Hugenburg and the League panicked and declared martial law across the country, ordering the military to go in and clear out the revolutionaries. At the same time, Jarres was calling the German high command and ordering them to confine the troops to barracks and instead let the German police disperse the putsch. While many generals held Pan-German sympathies and were self-described nationalists, they nonetheless chose to obey the orders from Jarres rather than Hugenberg, this was largely because of the worry that supporting the failing Hugenberg regime could spark a nationwide communist revolution and lead to a civil war. With the coup by this point dissolving into street fights between the League's under-equipped militias and the well-trained Prussian police in Berlin, as well as the fears that Jarres could still mobilize the army, led to Hugenberg conceding to the results of the election and the new german government disarmed and surrendered at the gates of the Reichstag. The belief among Hugenberg and his supporters was that there was no way the Police would be able to arrest every single person associated with the plot and that they might be granted amnesty similar to the ringleaders of the Kapp Putsch around a decade prior. They quickly learned this would not be the case, and as Hugenberg stepped out of the Reichstag, he and his supporters were surrounded by the full force of the Prussian Police, and forcibly taken into custody.

All in all, the two-day-long Constitutional Crisis of 1930 claimed the lives of some two hundred Germans on both sides. In its wake, the leaders of the attempted coup were sentenced to life imprisonment, with the exception of Hugenberg himself who was sentenced to death for high treason. The DNVP became defunct; its members were either arrested for their part in the crisis or left to help form the ‘Conservative People’s Party’ (KVP) [3], which would go on to officially replace the DNVP in almost all capacities. Protests and strikes, mostly by communists, persisted across Germany for another three weeks as the government tried to get itself under control, with new elections having to be called once again now that the DNVP as well as multiple other parties associated with the Pan-German League had either been dissolved or banned. The Crisis was extremely significant in the Weimar’s history, as while it would not be the last time civil discontent rose to a boiling point, nor the last time a group would attempt a putsch against the Weimar, it would be the last major revolt that had any chance of reshaping Germany. Although, in a way, it still did.”

- Republic of Weimar, by Franklin McAdoo


[1] I understand that this term may be considered offensive by some, and I apologize if that's how it is perceived. But I only intend here to show a level of historical accuracy. Sorry for the inconvenience.

[2] Here I actually took out quite a few direct quotes and altered them slightly from the very real Liaquat Ahamed's also real book; Lords of Finance. The book is mostly about financiers who caused the economic breakdown in 1929, but since this is an alternate timeline, the Weimars tumult gets a larger mention, and the content is slightly altered. This is probably going to be the largest extent of the actual economics and finance stuff in my TL since I’m not great with that.

[3] The KVP actually became a party in July of 1930 after moderate members of the DNVP broke with Hugenberg. That, of course, still happens, but they're much more prominent and don’t run out of funds by 1933.
 
Last edited:

The ‘Nazis,’ or NSDAP, fed like vultures on the mass hysteria of the German population, playing up their frustrations with the government to net themselves massive gains in the Reichstag and accelerating the party from fringe right-wing group to one of the largest single political parties in Germany.

Good update, but on a purely stylistic note it's probably better to say 'The NSDAP - or ' Nazis' - fed like vultures....' Proper name first, then nickname, especially since in this timeline the average reader won't be as familiar with the word 'Nazi.'
 
Chapter 3: The Freie Stadt
Chapter 3: The Freie Stadt

“There can be no doubt as to our next steps as a republic. If we wish to ensure safety, stability, and prosperity for our nation, we cannot stop anything short of the annihilation of the proponents of radicalism among us.”

- Excerpt from German Chancellor, Otto Wels, national address to the German people shortly after his appointment, December 16th, 1930


“Despite the fact that the NSDAP had not taken part in the coup attempt, they remained at the top of the hitlist for the Weimar government all throughout the next few years. The Nazis had managed to win all of Ostprussia and most of Pomerania in the recall elections, and their leader Adolf Hitler was already building his campaign for the 1932 presidential elections. They had inherited many of the votes of those sympathetic to the Pan-German League but had still lost significant popularity amongst the average Germans. Now acquainted with the nature of far-right politics, many did not want to vote the Nazis into power, given their own troubled history of putsch attempts.

The Nazis themselves had to do damage control as a result of the Constitutional Crisis, with Hitler assuring the government his platform was strictly a legal institution and renouncing his past desires for armed insurrection. This created its own split in the party, as members of the SA who saw themselves as the vanguard of a ‘brownshirt revolution’ were disappointed by the party's new stance. Many would split off and join leaders like Walter Stennes’ ‘Nationalsozialistische Kampfbewegung Deutschlands’ (NSKD) which would be a very shortlived attempt as they quickly attracted the attention of the police and were shut down by the end of 1931. All the same, these actions damaged the Nazi's prestige immensely, and while they were licking their wounds and rebuilding their movement, the Weimar government was cracking down.

Police would track and follow Nazi party leaders, and they would observe rallies carefully, often positioning themselves between the Nazis and their ‘targets’ such as Jewish neighborhoods. If they slipped up or did something illegal, there was the immediate promise of a swift crackdown. Why they did not necessarily enjoy following within the lines of the police of the Weimar republic, the SA and adjacent SS were left with little other choice than to show restraint. However that could only last for so long, and while many had expected violence to explode between the Nazis and the government forces in Berlin, Merseburg, or Dusseldorf. No one had expected that the catalyst for the Nazi's fall would come from tiny Danzig.”

- The Brown & The Red: Fascism and Communism in Germany in the 20th Century, Toni Greene


“I still remember my 29th birthday vividly. I had taken my time walking to the post office that morning, the same as every day before then. I knew that Jan would probably give me hell for it, but it was my birthday after all. I hadn’t assumed anything could happen on that day. I had been so terribly wrong, I was sitting at a cafe by the Motława when we heard the boom. I and everyone else on the street turned and looked to the location of the noise, just in time to see fire and smoke rising from the Senate Building. I heard women gasp and children cry, people began sprinting to the location in panic. I, too, had thought that perhaps it was the mail station that had gone up in smoke. When we all arrived, there was barely anything left of the building where our legislature once was. Outside were scores of police officers, standing alongside them members of the Danzig SS. No one bothered to question why they were standing outside the government building, or how they’d gotten there so quickly. All of us knew the truth.”

- A Postman’s Journal, by Alfons Flisykowski


“Danzig was perhaps the perfect encapsulation of German radicalism and its driving factors. Danzig’s ‘free state’ solution was a compromise forced upon a war-weary and above all, sour population. The supposed ‘free state’ ultimately existed at the whim of Warsaw which also decided its tariffs and held the entire city’s economic prosperity in the palm of its hand. As a result, the economic hardship that catapulted the city and its benefactor into extreme hardship became seen as foreign blunders that ordinary Germans would have to pay the cost of. So it was no surprise that its 90% majority German population became extremely susceptible to radical politics.

In 1930, Manfredi Gravina, the High Commissioner, and a devoted fascist swore in a senate made up of multiple NSDAP members, replacing the former mixed cabinet with one made up in almost its entirety of conservatives, both far-right and moderate. The Senate became quickly embroiled in a dispute over electing a President of the Senate. Moderates wanted candidates from the Zentrum party Gustav Fuchs, while the far-right parties like the NSDAP nominated the former SS-Gauleiter of Danzig Arthur Greiser. Eventually, both came to a compromise with former conservative Hermann Rauschning, who had a close relationship with the Nazi party but was also a well-spoken conservative. However, Rauschning clashed with the Gauleiter Albert Forster. Forster was close with the mandarins of the Nazi party and was an ambitious young man with a desire to aggressively ‘take the bull by the horns’. Forster had been hoping for a more nationalist-oriented senate in his favor with the absorption of the vacant Volkstag positions of the DNVP with fresh Nazi party members and was frustrated with the significant presence and influence of the Centre party in the Senate.

On multiple occasions, both the Senate and President would obstruct Forster's party and Volkstag's advancement, and he was repeatedly also obstructed from taking hold of the irridentist German organizations in the wider Polish corridor area. Forster's frustrations with the government finally fomented into open hostility, when Forster openly referred to the senate as ‘a gaggle of national traitors’. Shortly after this confrontation with the senate members, Forster held a correspondence with his close ally, Rudolf Hess. According to Forster, Hess at the meeting told him; ‘whatever you do, Hitler will be behind you.’ essentially giving the Gauleiter, in his mind at least, free reign in his actions. So on September 22nd, 1931, a bomb went off in the Senate Building of Danzig, killing the entire senate, and the Danzig SA mobilized to take hold of the entire city.”

- G-DANZ-IK [1]: The Free City, Samuel Beck


[1] A play on the German name Danzig and Polish name Gdańsk.
 
Last edited:
Very happy to see another Weimar TL! I really like your PoD, Jarres was one of the candidates that I had considered for my TL as well but I decided against him because I wanted to start my TL pretty much straight after WW1... The combination of Jarres and Wels is a reasonable one for achieving a solidly republican Germany, I believe! I'm most interested in seeing where this will head, consider me subscribed :)
 
I find it unlikely that Jarres would go against Article 48. Even the Social Democrats, Ebert in particular, resorted to Article 48 in order to pass legislation, and Stresemann did not have any objections towards the article itself, given that he used it during his government to remove the SPD-KPD coalition governments in Saxony and Thuringia, and Jarres was to my knowledge more to the right than Stresemann.
 
On multiple occasions, both the Senate and President would obstruct Forster's party and Volkstag's advancement, and he was repeatedly also obstructed from taking hold of the irridentist German organizations in the wider Polish corridor area. Forster's frustrations with the government finally fomented into open hostility, when Forster openly referred to the senate as ‘a gaggle of national traitors’. Shortly after this confrontation with the senate members, Forster held a correspondence with his close ally, Rudolf Hess. According to Forster, Hess at the meeting told him; ‘whatever you do, Hitler will be behind you.’ essentially giving the Gauleiter, in his mind at least, free reign in his actions. So on September 22nd, 1931, a bomb went off in the Senate Building of Danzig, killing the entire senate, and the Danzig SA mobilized to take hold of the entire city.”
Uh oh... This could be very bad. I wonder what Poland's reaction to this is going to be.
 
I am curious what the results of this bombing are going to be in terms of foreign affairs. After all Poland in the early 30s had a bigger army than Germany, a better equipped one and a government definitely willing to use it and I can't really see much opposition on the international stage in the middle of the great depression to for example a peacekeeping operation executed by the Poles, they may even get a league of nations mandate for such an act.
 
Given who did the bombing and how they are on the outs with the current government of Germany, I don't see the Germans being to upset if the Poles take the initiative to perform a peace keeping mission into Danzig. The Germans might even be able to accept some of the people who did it and on the run unofficially of course, but then because they were formenting problems in Germany itself have to arrest and put them in jail.
 
They had inherited many of the votes of those sympathetic to the Pan-German League but had still lost significant popularity amongst the average Germans
I'm not sure why so much importance is given to the Pan-German Leauge, given that even at their peak they had only 180k members.

I also thing the whole Danzig thing is kinda out of character for the NSDAP in the early 30s, given that at some point there was broad consensus across the top of the party about getting to power through the ballot, and had given up the ideas to stage a Putsch. Hitler would most definitely not give a "blank cheque" for this sort of action.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure why so much importance is given to the Pan-German Leauge, given that even at their peak they had only 180k members.

I also thing the whole Danzig thing is kinda out of character for the NSDAP in the early 30s, given that at some point there was broad consensus across the top of the party about getting to power through the ballot, and had given up the ideas to stage a Putsch. Hitler would most definitely not give a "blank cheque" for this sort of action.
Do we know that Hitler really gave his ok for the bombing?
As far as I can remember, it was only Hess saying "Be racist, do crimes" with a "Don't worry bro, Hitler for sure has your back! Just do whatever."
 
Top