Apologies (again) for the belated replies to some of these posts; life is getting increasingly busy these days.
That sort of view could pretty heavily alienate the non-wealthy, non-powerful strata of society; i.e. where the Plirites community will most heavily draw from, at least where Plirism isn't state doctrine. The common folk would definitely see a distinction between being born into the vessel of a king and being born into a vessel of a beggar. If it is the soul itself that makes the person, then the beggar by his deepest nature is meant to be downtrodden.
I may have not expressed this clearly. Most of what I see about the butterfly effect and different people being born that is discussed today (including on AH.com, but also elsewhere) is based on the recognition of modern genetics, that a genetically different person would be born if (for example) conception happened at a different moment. Without such a sense of modern genetics, and with a view of reincarnation, the idea that different consequences might lead to a different person being born doesn't make the same kind of sense; if the same soul is in there, then it is the same person.
This isn't a comment on social station in particular, although different Plirite schools have competing views on that anyway. Some see it as a case of behave properly in this life and you may be born a king in another life, others see it as just part of the vagaries of different consequences, and others have different interpretations again.
But in any case, I think it's somewhat difficult to argue in any society where population growth is perceivable that there's a limited number of souls going about, and when souls aren't considered to be bound to a temporal plane, there could be countless different souls "simultaneously" inhabiting a particular body. For atemporal entities I don't see any reason to put down a "one soul at one time" rule when there's no real way that souls can be seen as inhabiting one time.
The idea of one person having a single soul is pretty deep-rooted in the human psyche, as far as I can tell. I wouldn't expect that the idea that a person would be colonised by multiple souls is one that would come naturally, especially since there are plenty of other possible - and psychologically easier - solutions to the situation of greater population growing. Souls spending more time in bodies rather than in the Evertime, for instance, or of souls simply being born more often in the same time period.
Certainly, if you can send me an outline for it then I can do it.
Let me see what I can put together over the next few days.
I can only see the Five Rivers exporting to a local market over landroutes since they can't ship and most international markets can just get it more locally. There's also fact that historically, whenever new cash crops were introduced to places where they could be cultivated, they were. If the Five Rivers starts cultivating poppy first, if it can be grown wherever they export then the locals would start farming it for themselves and satisfy demand through local production.
The Five Rivers would have trouble exporting further than *Tasmania and *Western Australia, since there is a local network there by the remaining Nangu on the Island (who are nowadays largely unconnected to the Nuttana) which ships goods which are of no interest to the Nuttana and too local for Europeans to bother. This is how a small trade in gum cider persists, for instance.
Still, as you point out, there isn't going to be much of a market in the long run unless cultivation is curtailed; the market may last for a few decades before local cultivation picks up, but won't last forever. The only thing which would produce a big market is if the Yadji or Atjuntja rulers deem opium to be unacceptable on moral grounds and forbid its production and consumption. The official European trading companies would be unwise to interfere with such an edict, since they would risk the local rulers seeking different European protectors in that case. So that would mean it would be up to smugglers, and the Five Rivers would have the advantage of proximity and longer land borders for smuggling routes in both those nations.
The other possibility is that the Five Rivers develops stronger versions of opiates, particularly morphine. They will have a strong interest in opium anyway for medical purposes, and they have quite advanced chemistry. If they figure out the method for producing sulphuric acid on a large scale - which they will do sooner or later (unless conquered) - then I would expect experimentation to lead to the discovery of morphine in relatively short order. Morphine would be a very useful export good, both for obvious pain purposes, but also potentially as a strong drug.
On the other hand, basically no one ever farmed kratom on any major scale let alone imported it. If the Nuttana can set up local production, then kratom is different enough from opium (for one, it doesn't cause somnolence and respiratory depression, at least not as much as opiates do) for it to be marketable in places where opium was already around.
I can certainly see kratom being considered too. I don't know how big the market would be, but the Nuttana could certainly find some buyers if they looked around.
Given that koalas and opossums are the only non primate mammal species that have anything resembling thumbs it'd be cool to see a TL where one of the two's evolution takes a different tack and produces a more primate like lineage leading to some kind of sapient quasi human creatures.
Interesting idea, although my list of timelines to write is already far too long...
Kratom's recently gained a bit of popularity in the West, and largescale bans on it have only been recently. Could the Nuttana or others try and create markets for it? It certainly sounds like an appealing enough drug. And I don't see the side-effects being apparent enough before modern times to make the West clamp down on the drug for any reason but xenophobia. However, considering the history of marijuana, I could see kratom being banned in the West in the 19th or 20th centuries based on mostly exaggerated reasons and/or fears of scary Aururians and their heathen Plirite faith corrupting you through their drug. Which would be interesting in that you'd be shifting kratom's association from Indonesian to Aururian.
Aururia as the land of drug smugglers? Kratom and morphine, plus there's a wildcard one in south-eastern Aururia which I've considered developing too...
It's an energizing drug compared to opium's sedating effects, so I can see those who work long hours becoming the primary market for kratom. That presents a whole different sort of cultural impression that cannabis or opium / opiates would, where the latter was considered by the elites as making users (i.e. the lower classes) lazy and looking to get high to escape responsibility, while the same stigma didn't apply so much to the elites themselves. But kratom would be something that, although as enjoyable as opium in big enough doses, is more motivating and eliminates pain and fatigue from long hours of hard work. It's harder to justify as a corrupting influence to the elites when it is something used in the same capacity as coffee or tobacco (albeit lasting longer), not something with a "mind-bending" quality to it or something which leads people away from the Christian values of hard work. The Aururian origin of it can more or less be ignored, just like how the oriental origin of tea and coffee didn't matter, but the oriental connotations of opium and cannabis / hashish use were usually brought up in regards to how it was a corrupting influence, even though elites and aristocrats didn't face as much a stigma from drug usage as did commoners.
There's an intriguing overlap with
kunduri, which also has stimulant properties when used in moderate doses. Although the difference is that too much
kunduri leads to somnolescence.
Not to side track the thread but in the book After Man by Dougal Dixon there are Marsupial Monkeys in Australia 50 million years from now
http://speculativeevolution.wikia.com/wiki/Chuckaboo
Ah, yes, it's been a while since I read good ol'
After Man. Marsupials have already evolved a variety of forms which could turn into quasi-primates, although I'm most intrigued by the idea of some of the marsupial gliders turning into
flying quasi-primates.
Yeah, that is what I meant with the swan & peacock comparison.
Would it be possible to do any sort of selective breeding of koalas, in such conditions?
I know there are a couple of towns in the USA how to large numbers of wild albino squirrels
http://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/29067
I don't know whether there would be deliberate selective breeding, since with not-quite-tame koalas, trying to interfere with their breeding could be interesting. (Koalas who are in the mood are temperamental anyway, and have very sharp claws...) But unintentional selection is certainly possible.
It would be interesting if Aururian temples take the form of proto-zoos, albeit not open to the public necessarily. I think urban temples could manage something like a smaller enclosure, about as large as koala enclosures are in modern zoos, with a correspondingly small population of koalas. Rural temples in the right sort of environment could go with the sacred forest model, an somewhat curated area with a lot more koalas around since they'll have the room. In which case I suppose tame koalas would be provided by the rural temples to the urban temples.
It'd be funny if the Aururian idea of a monastery is not one where men of god live together and brew beer and make cheese, but rather where men live together to raise koalas.
One of the things about many parts of Aururia, particularly the Five Rivers and Durigal, is that they already have a very strong sense of
managed wilderness. That is to say, land which is not inhabited or farmed in the conventional sense, but which is still used for important parts of the diet. There were kinds of things like this in parts of OTL medieval Europe, such as deliberate managing of forests to allow a nutritionally significant number of berries to be gathered, and royal forests for hunting deer.
But the Aururians tend to be more systematic about it than Europeans. The artificial wetlands have already been well-described. So to a lesser degree is their deliberate cultivation of trees both for harvesting of timber, and other products (e.g. resin). They also have a sense of how to make sure that the right wildlife is around. For instance, possums need natural hollows for nesting and predator protection, and so are far less common in secondary-growth forests due to a lack of suitable nesting sites. The Five Rivers and Durigal have both figured out how to encourage possums through creating artificial nesting hollows attached to trees scattered throughout forests (possums are locally important for fur). Possums are not domesticated in any traditional sense, but they are harvested for fur nonetheless, and managed so that they don't become too rare. Aururians tend to manage the land in a whole variety of ways along these lines.
So there's quite a tradition for temples to draw from in terms of a temple turning into a koala paradise...
E: I was wondering about one thing, how do Plirites see the other Aururian religions in contrast to their own? Do they reject all other religions like how the Abrahamic religions considered all else to be pagan or otherwise heretical? Or is it like the philosophical continuum within the historical weft of Indian religious thought, where particular schools and faiths would saw themselves as being discrete entities, but would see more parallels between each other in particular beliefs, such as the astika - nastika classifications - allowing for a great deal of inter-traditional exchange?
There are strands in Plirite thought which run both ways, varying both over time and according to local conditions. One which may broadly be called exclusivism holds that it is best for all people to be Plirite, since that leads to better harmony. This is reflected in both orthodox Plirism (the Nangu school is strong on this), and in Tjarrling thought.
The other may be broadly called accommodationism, and which has made some form or other of accommodation with other religious views so that they can live alongside each other, and to an extent draw from each other. This is most common in the Five Rivers schools, although it also shows up elsewhere, such as with Plirite converts amongst the Kingdom of the Skin (Hunter Valley), where they are unable to convert a majority of the population and so perforce have made some adaptations.
I see reason enough for both outlooks, differing between particular schools. The Tjarrlinghi, especially in Tjuwagga's age, should have more reason to adopt the former attitude towards non-Plirites, at least to justify an expansionistic ideology.
The Hunter has adopted a school of exclusivism which is that the government, at least, should be Plirite, even if not everyone else is.
The schools scattered around the Gunnagal and Durigal regions should have incentive towards the latter approach, where Plirite schools and philosophical traditions which don't stem from the Good Man's teachings would inevitably intermingle in discourse and sharing of ideas. The more deistic Plirites would presumably receive influence from the priesthoods of particular gods, though I'm not sure if the latter would be as tolerant of the former as vice versa.
Definitely this is the case amongst the Gunngal, and also elsewhere in the remaining Five Rivers nations. (Plirism was the state religion of now-vanished Lopitja, but has not been as successful elsewhere). Not so much amongst Durigal, where the Yadji also claim exclusive religious primacy, and some of the Plirites there such as the Yadilli have responded by developing their own exclusivist beliefs in response (although unable to turn those into conquest, of course).
I'm reminded of Clements' saying in the first instalment: “Religion was not something you were, it was something you did." Distinctions, I surmise, have as much or more to do with how people behave than with what they avow. I guess with an emphasis on praxis, the whats whys and hows of actions a philosophy incites would be one of the primary distinguishing features? Are there any schemata that categorise philosophies / religions / schools based on praxis in Plirism and other religions / traditions?
I really should find the time to write up a more detailed version of Five Rivers religion and broader Gunnagalic mythology. But the short version is that in keeping with their ancestral traditions, most Five Rivers peoples have a whole bunch of local deities, or give primacy to different deities. These traditions are strongly linked to particular families, and in many cases, also to specific sites. They can get quite mixed up when family lines cross, if new deities become popular for one reason or another, and so forth. But there is no strong sense that one religion must apply to everyone.
So a Five Rivers family might say "these are the deities
we worship" or "these are the rites we perform at this time of year", without provoking arguments over religious exclusivity. They also have no problem adding additional rites at particular times of year if it seems worthwhile, which is how various aspects of Plirism have been incorporated into the actions of people who would not consider themselves Plirite. It also means that the Plirite minority, by social interaction, also sometimes adopt particular rites which have been practices of the traditional religion.
No analogy should be drawn too closely, of course, but there are some parallels which could be drawn with Hindu India in the time after Buddhism had emerged but did not take over completely, or with some strands in historical Chinese or Japanese attitudes to religion where they are incorporate practices or rites from more than one religious tradition depending on circumstances.
State religions have emerged, such as the imperial cult and that of Lopitja, but none of these have completely displaced the older practices.
As a side note, during the Great Migrations, things got shaken up enough outside of the Five Rivers that the links to local sites and particular families were lost, along with beliefs in many local deities. So what emerged amongst the migrants was a smaller group of deities in different societies, obviously descended from the older deities, but reworked into a new form. In these cases, each region tends to have its own set of gods, with some changes from the ancestral ones, but not the same sense of religion being a matter of practice rather than belief.
Speaking of scurvy, is not a way to avoid it rose hip? It has a lot of vitamin C in it and as long as the temperature does not go over 60C it's fine? And dried it does not take up much space. Seems better than sauerkraut, but I have not done the research. And you can grind it and make it into a soup:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_hip_soup
I'm thinking sailors putting some rose hip paste in their stews, when they're simmering.
Rose hip would certainly be very useful when fresh. The problem with that, as with many other such foods, is whether the preservation method keeps the Vitamin C from decaying over time. The Nuttana have access to what is as far as I know the highest-concentration Vitamin C fruit of all, Kakadu plums (averaging about 45-60 times the Vitam C content of an orange, and up to 100 times in some cases). But drying usually destroys the Vitamin C content of fruits, if not immediately, then over time.
I'd need to look into whether drying rose hips has the same problems.