Actually in Part XIX this is touched on (See Kennebec class carriers). The Battles around Wake revealed a desperate need for high speed oilers and thus the decision is made NOT to convert the Cimarron class oilers to the Sangamon class escort carriers. Instead four slower oilers (OTL's Kennebec class) are chosen.
That makes sense. If a big part of the availability of extra ships in the Pacific is a reduced German threat, perhaps other Cimarron class ships such as the USS Salamonie could be delpoyed to the Pacific a year or so sooner then OTL.
Biggest issue with the Kennebec class, if you plan to use them for Torch, especially an earlier then OTL Torch, aside from being smaller then the Sangamon class carriers and likely having somewhat lesser aircraft capacity, there's also still a bottleneck in construction and getting the ship safe for operations. All four OTL Sangamon class ships had been in service already as oilers since 1940/41, and while a lot of work on the ships had to be done to make them into carriers, stuff like general shakedowns, testing the hull, making sure the propulsion and power systems and other basic equipment was in safe and working order had already been taken care of well before the carrier conversions, and some members of the crew where already familiar with their jobs, shaving off a lot of time on training.
Here the 4th Kennebec class ship, USS Kankakee, wasn't even launched until end of January 1942, and didn't complete shakedown trials and enter the fleet til up in March. That's not factoring in the time it would take to actually do the conversions and make sure that worked out fine.
http://wonderduck.mu.nu/the_best_of_the_jeeps
Additionally, the design and use of the Sangamons played a not insignificant roll in the development of the Casablance class CVE. That's not to say that the Casablanca class would turn out bad ITTL, but some practices or lessons learned for the construction and use of that class could be impacted here with an inferior class such as your proposed Kennebec class.
Even with the four ships of the Cimarron class that where converted, they where still able to act as oliers on occasion, with one of the ships actually returning to duty post war as an oiler.
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/us_esc3.htm
With the Kennebec class, you also have a major speed disadvantage. The Kennebec class could only get up to around 16.5 knots, not really fast.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennebec-class_oiler
http://uboat.net/allies/warships/class/434.html
http://pwencycl.kgbudge.com/K/e/Kennebec_class.htm
Sangamons and Bogue class CVE could do 18 knots, and the purpose built Casablanca could do 20 knots. Not counting any carriers built pre war, there are no carriers, especially small CVE and CVL with a top speed of less then 18 knots.
http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/8194-march-13th-focus-uss-sangamon-class-cves/
The T3 tankers carried 146,000 barrels of fuel and are overall larger than the C3 cargo ships being converted to the Bogue Class CVE’s. Both types of ships were faster at more than 16 knots than most other merchant ships. This increased speed is terribly important as more “over the deck wind speed” allows launching of heavier aircraft, or in the case of short decked escort carriers any aircraft at all. In low wind conditions with their low speed the smaller carriers could not launch heavily or even fully laden aircraft which greatly reduced their ability to fulfill their missions.
Given that the Sangamons and Bogues could have trouble launching aircraft even with a top speed of 18 knots, having the Kennebec class with a top speed of 16.5 knots will have an impact on their ability or lack thereof to put aircraft in the air.
There is the case of the USS Long Island and her sister ship the HMS Archer, both of which could only get up to around 16.5 knots. But considering USS Long Island primarily acted as a training carrier or as a transport at times, and the HMS Archer had quite a few accidents or difficulties and resulted in the ship being decommissioned in early 1944 after having never gone into combat, mainly acting as a transport or being assigned to backwater commands, I don't think that speaks well of that class of ship.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Archer_(D78)#HMS_Archer