Hecatee
Donor
In 415 Alcibiades convinced the Athenian Assembly to send a huge force to Sicily under his command. Yet on the night before the fleet left Athens a scandal happened that was attributed to Alcibiades. Yet no one accused him publicly on that day and it was only some weeks later that a war galley came from Athens to southern Italy where the main fleet was in preparation for the attack on Syracuse. On board this galley an order to seize Alcibiades and bring him home for trial. Fleeing Alcibiades then went to Sparta where he gave the Spartans keys for defeating Athens, made contacts with Persian Satraps that were neutral in order that they support Sparta with gold and then in 411 came back to his own people, leading them to a string of victories before a defeat in 406 made him loose prestige and command. Giving new counsels to the Athenians in 405 he could not prevent the Aigos Potamos disaster that led to the surrendering of Athens to Sparta and the end of the Peloponesian war. He was assassinated some months later on orders from Sparta.
The question I intend to explore with this time line is the consequences of a different turn of events in 415. Here we have many different possibilities :
Now what is your view on this small analysis, and do you think it worth some more thought and the creation of a timeline ?
The question I intend to explore with this time line is the consequences of a different turn of events in 415. Here we have many different possibilities :
- The expedition is not launched at the planned date, Alcibiades is tried and :
- found guilty and executed, the expedition is then either
- launched under command of Nicias and leads to the same disaster
- cancelled
- found not guilty and he leaves for Sicily in command of the fleet
- he is defeated
- he wins and takes Syracuse
- found guilty and executed, the expedition is then either
- The expedition is launched at the planned date and :
- the Athenians do not try him "in abstensia" or try him and found him not guilty and he keeps command of the expedition
- the Athenians try him "in abstensia" and he accepts to go back to Athens, leaving command to Nicias, never going to Sparta
- he flee as historical but not to Sparta and thus does not give his precious advices to the Spartans
- The expedition is not launched : Athens keeps lots of money and 50 000 warriors and 200 ships, thus having a huge advantage when war with Sparta is renewed
- The expedition is a success and brings lots of riches to Athens, as well as a fresh supply of horses and puts all of Sicily in Athenian power, bringing taxes like the Delos League already does
- The expedition might then get further and follow the plans hinted by Thucydides of conquest of Carthage and/or Italy, either a success or a disaster which might shatter athenian control in the west
- In any case where Sicily falls a bigger presence of the Greeks in the west, which has huge consequences on the populations of Italy ( more hellenized, more structured, a bigger challenge to Rome which may not rise to the first place in Italy )
Now what is your view on this small analysis, and do you think it worth some more thought and the creation of a timeline ?