What if Eisenhower decided to support the UK, France, and Israel during the Suez crisis in 1956? How might this affect the Middle East, the Cold War, and the politics of Britain, France, Egypt, the US, Israel, etc.?
Not necessarily. At the time, the Soviets had their hands full with the uprising in Hungary and the rumblings throughout Eastern Europe; they wouldn't have started WW3 over events that took place outside of their sphere of influence.Three characters, my friend. WW3.
Not necessarily.
How good does that sound?Relations between the US and France do not collapse, never to fully recover.
The British do not walk out east of Suez and reduce their military to a shadow of what they previously had.
Nassar is overthrown. The UAR never exists.
The US and UK do not have to deploy forces to Lebanon and Jordan, nor does the US fight a proxy war via Saudi Arabia in Yemen for a few years.
Relations between the US and France do not collapse, never to fully recover.
The British do not walk out east of Suez and reduce their military to a shadow of what they previously had.
Nassar is overthrown. The UAR never exists.
The US and UK do not have to deploy forces to Lebanon and Jordan, nor does the US fight a proxy war via Saudi Arabia in Yemen for a few years.