What about the effects of Old World diseases on the Australians?
I assume they've been as isolated as the Amerindians were. And for much longer.
The effects of Eurasian diseases on the Australians will be very, very bad. Perhaps not quite as bad as they were on the Amerindians, for a couple of reasons which will be touched on in the next post, but still catastrophic. Figure 80% die-off as an absolute minimum.
I'd also very much like to have a go, though an EdT map would be pretty awesome
.
Hmm, how many volunteers do I have here?
Oooo have they bred up something new? Or is this just strains of Eurasian diseases?
There is a rather different strain of one disease which is similar to Eurasian diseases, one which is closely related but a distinct species, and one which is quite different from anything which has been seen before.
If its the former and virulent then that'll have a long-term slight depressent effect on global population growth, which would be very interesting.
The Gunnagal speak of this thing called "the Waiting Death." The Dutch will speak of, well...
Well they certainly are going to find smallpox an unpleasent suprise.
And measles, mumps, tuberculosis, typhus, dysentery, diptheria, whooping cough, chickenpox...
Or have everyone each do a small section of the map...in different styles and then mosaic them together
That would be epic... Especially if each person did one particular country or region and it all came together as the entire continent of Australia...
Or we could just work together... time will tell.
Hmm...
That was an excellent update, and I can see that you've set this up for some sort of climactic fall, or a war or something terrible.
Things will be both good and bad for them in the next couple of posts. On the one hand, there's a developing empire. On the other hand, there's a developing empire...
That being said, the Gunnagul people have advanced so far in the span of the last 4-500 years and i can see that they've reached some sort of "renaissance", how far can we expect their technology to be by the time europeans arrive in another 1300 years?
The Classical Gunnagal of c. 1 AD are roughly equivalent to where the Sumerians were in, oh, 3000 BC. Developed quite a few things, but only just got writing going. 1600 years after that, in Mesopotamia, quite a few technologies and social organisation had developed, but it was still not even the Iron Age.
Of course, the Classical Gunnagal are not quite like the Sumerians. There's one thing which will help them develop faster, technology-wise: the higher urban populations. But then they are also relatively isolated from other cultures, which will slow down technological progress. So as to how far things progress, well... They will be more advanced, certainly. But there will be a lot of things they don't know how to do.
Fascinating as always, Jared! Keep 'er comin'!
Gracias. Check this space in two weeks...
You've said you've done non-fiction work (academic writing)? A polished synthesis like this shows it.
Thanks. Yes, I have had done a bit of academic writing, some of which has even been published. Hopefully that doesn't show all the time... sometimes it's a better idea not to sound like an academic.
I would have thought that a large civilisation like the above would have a much greater chance of trade or contact with the SE Asia peoples. Plus I believe the Maori/Pacific Islands have been noted as trading partners.
Perhaps we could see some sort of Maoris as Vikings scenario?
There are various reasons why the Classical Gunnagal don't develop much in the way of boat-building. One is that their experience of boats is the sort of shallow-draft, flat-bottomed vessels which work well in a relatively shallow river like the Murray, but which aren't easily adapted to the sea. A second reason is that unlike most other major rivers, the Murray is not navigable from the sea. It's not possible to sail boats in and out of the Murray from the open sea, which is rather a disincentive for developing seafaring technologies.
A third and probably most important reason is that the seas around Australia are not conducive to the development of long-range seafaring. Most early seafaring developed in relatively small, stable seas (e.g. Med, Baltic, Persian Gulf) where it was possible to work out some seagoing techniques before getting into really rough waters. This allowed for the evolution of sailing technology. Australian waters aren't like that. There's all sorts of stormy weather, horrible currents, a lack of many good harbours (especially along the southern coast), and winds and currents which make reaching Asia and then coming back home difficult.
All in all, while maritime technology will slowly develop in Australia, it's not the sort of place where it's likely to develop quickly. The arrival of the Maori will actually kick-start maritime technology, but it's only about 300 years from that until Europeans arrive.
For Maoris as Vikings, well... The technological advantage lies rather more with the *Australian farmers. The Maori have stone tools, the Gunnagal have bronze weapons and armour. That's not to say that there'd be no raiding, but I suspect peaceful trading will be the main form of interaction.
Yay for the Classical Gunnagal!
Scandinavian merchants traditionally captured slaves in part to haul stuff to the markets where the stuff (and the slaves) could be sold.
That may happen in certain circumstances, although places to go raiding for slaves in Australia may be somewhat limited.
Fantastic post, really interesting stuff this. I wish I knew enough to comment more, but it all feels spot on.
Merci.
Three thoughts.
First, is there anything in the northern tropical regions that Gunnagalia would consider worth harvesting? As you've mentioned, the flora is different enough that domestication won't have had time to get underway before the Europeans show up, but are there any plants that would be worth simply gathering them wild and then shipping them south?
A few spices, perhaps, and maybe a couple of species of fruit. But not much. There may be some other things - Australia's only genuine amber is found in Cape York, for instance. But on the whole, northern Australia won't be of a great deal of interest to the Gunnagal further south.
Second, when the Maori show up, I presume they'll be bringing pigs along with them.
The Maori didn't have pigs. Their only domestic animal was the dog. (Although the Polynesian rat tagged along to NZ, too.) They missed out on a lot of the Polynesian crops and agricultural package. Sweet potato was the main thing which they could grow (there was a little farming of taro and other tropical crops, but not very much.)
Is there anything else on New Zealand that the Gunnagalians might consider worth the trouble of importing? Particularly in terms of some of the exotic fauna, or any potential crops the Gunnagalians might want to domesticate?
In terms of fauna, the moa will probably be hunted out too quickly to do much with. Moa were also slow-growing birds (even the smaller ones), taking about ten years to reach adulthood. Emus, by contrast, do it in about a year. (This is probably why emus survived human hunting while moas didn't.)
For domesticable crops, not much that's native to New Zealand. Bracken fern was used by the Maori, but that's also native to Australia, and not really of much use (low energy value). There was a tree called the cabbage tree which was semi-cultivated, but again it's of no huge advantage. The main crops which will interest the Gunnagal will be the sweet potato and taro, which will grow in tropical areas of Australia. And New Zealand flax, which was a very good fibre crop. (Unrelated to Eurasian or Australian flax.)
New Zealand greenstone (jade) will be valued, and probably a few exotic woods (kauri), kauri gum, and a few other things along those lines.
Third, how much contact was there between the Maori and the greater SE Asian trade routes?
There was no significant contact between the Maori and the greater SE Asian trade routes. There seems to have been a little low-level contact between the Maori and their ancestral islands (the Cook Islands, or maybe Tahiti, depending on who you ask), which lasted until maybe the fifteenth century before fading away. The Maori lost most of the long-distance navigation skills after reaching New Zealand - they found nothing worth sailing that way for, I suppose. After contact with Australia, they will find something sailing that way for, and that probably means a very slow transmission of ideas and goods via the Cook Islands, but that will take a while to have much effect elsewhere in the world.
Because what you mentioned about spice made me wonder if there would be any chance of Gunnagalians importing spice trees.
Probably too isolated from the main trade routes for spices to be imported to Australia, alas. Especially since the main Asian spices won't grow in the areas where the Gunnagal live.
And come to think of it, the one other area where there might be some small degree of outside trade (assuming I'm not completely wrong about the currents and wind patterns) is in the OTL Perth region. In OTL, even if someone from India or Indonesia had stumbled across the area before the Europeans, there simply wouldn't have been anything worth the trouble of stopping for. With an agricultural civilization, though, trading for food before heading back across the Indian might be useful. There wouldn't be much contact, but perhaps enough that the Dutchmen from your first snippet knew that there was something worth looking for there, if not the precise details.
The problem with sailing up the western coast of Australia is that it's easy to go north (barring reefs), but damnably difficult to sail south. The Dutch explored from south to north without difficulty, but the prevailing winds and currents make it a lot harder to go the other way. What contact there was between Indonesia and Australia was mostly confined to the north (following the monsoon winds back and forth), not further south. Even the native Australias in the Perth region would find that they could sail north, but they'd probably have to walk back...
In particular, is sericulture viable in Australia? If that somehow made it to the continent, it might have some impact on the local trade patterns.
I'm not sure whether sericulture would be viable in the south of Australia. It would be viable in the north, I presume, but the south may be too cold. Of course, as per the above, it's unlikely to get established anyway. Certain kinds of aboriculture would probably work, though. (Cork wood springs to mind, and sandalwood.)
Do the Gunnagal ever take to the seas?
Even if it's just sailing around the coast.
Eventually, slowly. They do colonise Tasmania on their own. Contact with the Maori and exposure to Polynesian sailing techniques will revolutionise their maritime tradition. By the time of European contact, there will be a seafaring culture based in OTL south-eastern Queensland (the Kiyungu) which is slowly exploring further north, but they won't quite have made it to contact with Asia before Europeans show up.