Interesting, an Italian Texas... you know, come to think of it I think southern Italians would love the climate of Texas.
Yes, I thought it would be appropriate. And, of course, it's ideal for many Aururian crops too, for whatever that's worth.
What I am most excited to see: continued clash of civilizations in Aururia, of course, how Aururian crops affect Buenos Aires and the rest of Argentina, the Ottoman adoption of new crops, and the alternate colonization of the eastern seaboard of North America.
These will probably all be covered in time, but not too soon. Partly because some of them will take lots of research, but mostly because I want to concentrate on the "present" of the TL for a while.
I'd love to see an update focusing heavily on alternate technological developments, both in Aururia (adapting to European tech) and elsewhere.
I'll have to think about this one. I'm still really not sure what the pace of technology will be ITTL, since there are factors that might both accelerate it or decelerate it.
How Sicilian would the resulting culture be? Will it be similar to Argentina, where it's the predominant ethnicity but everyone shifts to Spanish? Or will they be a cohesive enough group settling a sparsely populated area that they'll retain their ethnic identity?
There will be at least a plurality of Sicilians settling large parts of *Texas. I'd expect that they would retain their language and significant parts of their culture, although I've still not finally settled on that.
IIRC the main reason the Argentines don't speak Italian today is because the groups which settled there spoke such divergent dialects that Spanish was as good a common language as any. But if ITTL people are from mostly one region of *Italy, it will be a different matter.
More from Sicily than anywhere else, although there will of course be a mixture. Of course, ITTL Sicilian is something of a prestigious dialect anyway, so there will be strong temptation for other Italian settlers to learn it.
Keep in mind that at least half the population seems to have been Sephardic Jews, who kept on to their culture well enough that some modern-day people in the region have pictures of their grandparents wearing yarmulkes and remember having seders in all but name. So those families still have a really strong interest in getting the hell out of Spanish control ASAP.
Hmm. They may have that motivation, but would it take actual Spanish military power to reconquer the place? Spain's priorities will probably be elsewhere.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to hear more about the Ottoman Empire. I have a few ideas about what will happen here.
1. Although the initial plagues will happen everywhere, I tend to think that the Ottomans will be in a rush to keep their frontier areas more heavily populated. Which means if depopulated areas like Banat creep up, I could see them encouraging whole ethnic groups to move into the Balkans. So we could end up with more Muslims in Europe than IOTL.
Hmm. If more Muslims means lower tax revenues, this is also a problem. Which way would that one go?
The other point which makes the Balkans more complex is that the only areas which are really spared from the worst of the Aururian plagues are isolated villages and out of the way places, which the initial wave of the plagues may well pass by. Especially if the plague goes through in winter (when a lot of travel shuts down). Sure, secondary waves may still hit some of those regions later, but those waves won't spread as well anyway since a lot of the potential carriers are already immune.
Some areas which may thus be spared from the worst of the plagues would include some of the highland areas of the Balkans... which are more heavily Christian than the (relatively more) Muslim lowlands. So there may be some post-plague push of Christian highlanders into the lowlands in the Balkans. Not sure how that could end up.
2. At the same time, the Aururian crop package is going to revolutionize the Ottoman Empire. Virtually the entire populated area can grow at least some of the the crops. and the Levant, Northern Iraq, and Southern Turkey (essentially the old fertile crescent) ideal. This will make the center of gravity of the Empire drift more into Asia, and provide big increases in manpower, and economic activity, over time.
Certainly the potential is there. Although Greece will also do very well. What intrigues me is that - as per some previous discussions on this topic - there are some areas where the Aururian crops can be grown, but which were in territory claimed by some of the various nomadic groups. Just because the crops can be grown in those regions doesn't mean that they will... if the nomads have anything to say about it. I'm not sure how this will go.
3. Still, the Ottomans are in a pickle. Since they gained revenue mainly by Jizyah, having a higher population in the Middle East isn't going to be ideal, as it means more infrastructure needs but less tax revenue to pay for it. So I wonder if the Ottomans will, one way or another, try and boost the Christian population in the region. Perhaps by providing special protections against proselytization to groups like the Armenians, Assyrians, and Marionites (similar to the essential ban in Europe), in exchange for loyalty. Perhaps even actively recruiting Christian and Jewish migrants from Europe.
If post-plague Europe suffers from more out-breaks of anti-Semitism, might an active Jewish homeland in Palestine be one possibility the Ottomans consider? Especially since Poland, which would otherwise be an attractive option, is unfortunately likely to be the victim of an "everybody hates Poland" alliance (*Deluge).
You know, history could diverge quite rapidly in the Ottoman Empire. One interesting point is that it is probable that Marnitja and Blue-Sleep will hit the Ottomans at the same time instead of in different waves. Marnitja hits Amsterdam in 1627, right? And spreads from there. Blue-sleep starts from Timor and burns through Asia to Europe, hitting the continent in 1631. It is probable that Blue-sleep will break out in the Ottoman Empire before it strikes Europe, and that Marnitja will break out in the Ottoman Empire later. 1629-1630 could see the arrival of both diseases at the same time.
Marnitja does indeed hit the Ottomans around 1629, although it doesn't come via Europe. Or, at least, not just via Europe. It spread from Madagascar up the African coast, hitting Egypt in 1628 and spreading to Mecca in time for the hajj in 1629, and from there it was carried more or less everywhere in the Muslim world.
Blue-sleep also burns through the Ottoman Empire around 1630. Not quite simultaneous, but not long after. A nasty time to be alive, for those who survive.
It wasn't a very good time for the Ottoman Empire to be dealing with such pandemics either. The period 1623 to 1632 is described as a time of anarchy and corruption. Sultan Murad IV, a strong, brutal leader, would be only 17 in 1629 and true power remained with his relatives. It is possible that if the diseases kill some of his family members and leave him alone that he could assert his own power in 1630 rather than in 1632 and begin to re-establish the supremacy of the Sultan.
I hadn't worked out the fates of every prominent Ottoman, but I'd already calculated that Murad IV survives apparently without even contracting the diseases. (He did actually catch them, but so mildly that he showed no visible symptoms.) It may help his political position to claim that he was clearly protected by God, since the malady had no effect on him.
Gazi Ekrem Hüsrev Pasha does die of Marnitja in 1629 - although I'm not sure whether that really helps.
If he falls to one of the diseases, though, the anarchy is only going to get worse. Persia was invading Iraq, northern Anatolia was facing revolts, and there was widespread insurrection among the Janissaries. Murad IV already had his hands full, how will he deal with even more chaos?
Badly, I expect. Or, at least, dealing with internal problems will probably keep him from showing much interest in the world beyond the Ottoman borders, except for the immediate problem of Persia.
What could help his cause is if his enemies are more weakened by the diseases than he, so we'd need to see how Persia, Iraq are affected, also the Caucasus. Even if Murad IV leads successful military campaigns as in OTL, he died very early, in 1640 at the age of 27. Even if he avoids the Aururian plagues he could die much sooner due to the more dangerous conditions, leaving the throne to his mad brother Ibrahim I (assuming he avoids the plagues and also a possible execution order from the Sultan preventing him to succeed to the throne).
In Persia, Abbas I actually survives Marnitja (which reached Persia by sea in 1628), and then died of natural causes, like OTL in January 1629. His son Safi survived both the plagues. Of course, losing a large part of their military manpower doesn't do the Persians much good, but they do still hold Baghdad.
For Ibrahim I, he avoids the plagues. Whether he'd avoid Murad IV's execution order is another question, but I'd need to look more into that to work it out.
Jared, want to tell us which characters in this drama will live and die from the plagues? Don't forget
Kosem, the powerful mother-regent of both Murad during his minority and Ibrahim afterward. We could also probably butterfly away the rise of
Turhan Hatice, the next powerful mother-regent, as she was sold into slavery and then gifted to Kosem as a concubine around 1640 at the age of 12... what are the chances such a girl will find her way into such a place of power given so many butterflies?
Kösem survives. Turhan will almost certainly be butterflied away from power, if she survives the plagues at all.
Man, an update solely based on the Ottoman Empire would be awesome.
It will probably happen at some point, but I can't promise when. I need much more information about the Ottoman Empire before I can write a decent update.
I wonder when the Aururian crops would begin to be utilized there. Red yams were first planted in Portugal in 1648, right? That could mean they spread to parts of the Ottoman Empire throughout of the 1650s and the 1660s.
I'd say that the Ottomans are more likely to get Aururian crops via the Indian Ocean than via Portugal, although of course the latter is possible as a secondary route.
The important question is whether the Ottomans get the crops as a package and with the required knowledge, or if they just get imported piecemeal. The crops will still be useful if the Ottomans just get them one by one and start using them. But they would be much more useful if the Ottomans got the whole combination of plants with the best knowledge for planting, harvesting, crop rotation, and so forth.
Some Old World peoples managed to find Aururian teachers who taught them the whole package together - the Dutch used Mutjing farmers in South Africa, while the Portuguese used Yadilli farmers in Portugal proper. If the Ottomans can find a similar group of people to help their own farming, things will be much more successful for them.
Absence of Turhan Hatice as the regent could have great effect on Eastern European history in 1650s through 1670s, as she was of Ruthenian descent, and some researchers think that Ottoman support for various Ruthenian Cossack warlords in the period was at least partly caused by the regent's own pro-Ruthenian attitudes.
That is, the Ottomans would support anti-Polish and (later) anti-Russian revolts, Turhan or no Turhan, as it was in their interests to do, but the scale of this support might be different.
This will cause substantial changes, then, since Turhan Hatice definitely won't be ending up as regent. The Polish Question will still occupy them, but that's another story...
Of course, Jared wrote earlier that history of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (and its Ruthenian provinces) would be changed profoundly by effects of Aururian plagues (some princes would die, and other would start their reign earlier), so it might be that there would be no Great Revolt of 1648 as we know it, with corresponding changes in Ottoman policies towards the region.
I'm not sure about the Great Revolt of 1648, but one thing which is certain is that Poland is going to end up with even more enemies than it had in OTL (which is an achievement), and the *Deluge is not going to be nice. At all. What the Ottomans will do during this time is something which I still need to figure out.
Just wanted to pop in and say hi. I'm working on a similar project (
http://bensen-daniel.deviantart.com/gallery/27912685) and one of my beta-readers recommended I read Red and Gold. I'm about halfway through it and I love it. Especially the ecology. And the fictionalized personal stories, which I hope I'll see more of.
Glad you like it. More is coming, of course, in a variety of formats. Unfortunately, though, various life commitments (the w- word and the other w-word, plus I'm now co-authoring a non-fiction piece) means that fresh instalments don't come all that often.