Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th, 2010, 04:26 AM
TNF TNF is offline
Demarchratic Socialist
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1000 or more
AHC: Ameriwank from 1901

Writing in 1901, the Akron Daily Democrat predicted the following of the United States one hundred years hence:

Quote:
Washington, Feb. 11. -- ...the United States, then will have acquired the whole of the western hemisphere attaining a population of 300,000,000; that the President will be from Montreal, U.S.A., will have forty cabinet members to appoint; that the Senate will consist of 300 members and the House 800, and that Washington on that day will entertain 3,000,000 visitors, most of whom view the inaugural parade from airships...
Your challenge is to make this a reality. Have the United States stretch from pole to shining pole on March 4, 2001 (one hundred years since McKinley's inaugural) with a POD no earlier than March 4, 1901. Double bonus points if the United States remains a democracy for the entire period, and triple bonus points if the nations join willingly.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 7th, 2010, 04:39 AM
Andras Andras is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
With a population of only 300 million for both continents in 2001, a world recovering from a mega-disaster or epidemic could look that way. An early POD would be a far worse Spanish Flu epidemic then OTL.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:26 PM
Gridley Gridley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Everett, WA, USA
Posts: 1000 or more
Not going to do the whole thing, but I recommend the Banana wars turning hotter in the '30s instead of colder (and ending in 1934 in OTL). The US holds onto Cuba, Haiti, etc., and border violence with Mexico leads to a semi-contrived causus belli when the US gets fed up.

Can't think of a way offhand to plausibly expand the southern US border past the canal zone, however.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:29 PM
Tallest Skil Tallest Skil is offline
Terrible At Everything
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Posts: 1000 or more
View the parade from airships...

Yes, and they traveled to D.C. via the intracontinental pneumatic tube system.

Ah, the early 1900s and their pneumatic tubes. I think it's just because they liked to type the word pneumatic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 17th, 2010, 03:06 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is offline
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andras View Post
With a population of only 300 million for both continents in 2001, a world recovering from a mega-disaster or epidemic could look that way. An early POD would be a far worse Spanish Flu epidemic then OTL.
Heh. Ja, the US has 300 million today all by itself!

Edit: maybe a reverse John Birmingham scenario - everything EXCEPT the US is wiped out by a strange force field that turns humans into jelly?
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) or here.
Turtledove 2010
updated: 30 Aug '13
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 17th, 2010, 03:41 PM
GreatScottMarty GreatScottMarty is offline
Stuck with Laurens-Burr
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio Country
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridley View Post
Not going to do the whole thing, but I recommend the Banana wars turning hotter in the '30s instead of colder (and ending in 1934 in OTL). The US holds onto Cuba, Haiti, etc., and border violence with Mexico leads to a semi-contrived causus belli when the US gets fed up.

Can't think of a way offhand to plausibly expand the southern US border past the canal zone, however.
German interference in Argentina, Paraguay and Colombia causes Venezeula, Chile and Brazil to get concerned and turn to the US for aid? The war of the Triple Alliance (was that the one from the 30s?) is a German proxy war in addition to Spanish Civil War?
__________________
Laurens Lives!! Slaves Freed!! North and South United by Federalism!! Awaiting Reboot December 2011
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 17th, 2010, 04:32 PM
Gridley Gridley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Everett, WA, USA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatScottMarty View Post
German interference in Argentina, Paraguay and Colombia causes Venezeula, Chile and Brazil to get concerned and turn to the US for aid? The war of the Triple Alliance (was that the one from the 30s?) is a German proxy war in addition to Spanish Civil War?
Hmm. Let's crank that up a notch. Germany succeeds in installing a fascist puppet state in Argentina. Realizing that the US will have to react eventually they decide to push ahead and conspire with the neo-fascist elements in Brazil to start another Spanish Civil War there, funneling arms via Argentina to create plausible denialability. The US intervenes directly, which naturally results in a win in Brazil. Victory disease takes hold a bit and the US invades Argentina as well...

Edit: Oh, and the Brazilians see the US saving them from the fascists and then invading Argentina. This leads to Viva America! being shouted around the nation. A movement (a minority, but a vocal one) petitions to join the US (the pre-war government mostly died in the fighting and there are no clear local heroes to rally behind).

Last edited by Gridley; September 17th, 2010 at 04:35 PM.. Reason: Added text
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 17th, 2010, 04:58 PM
archaeogeek archaeogeek is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1000 or more
The main problem you get from this, ultimately, is that the demographics by 1901 were already shifting away from when the US was half the population of the continent... I can already see areas of the old US screaming bloody murder at the size of the congress delegation in latin america (by now, 68% of the House of Reps and even the smallest division I can put together for the senate still has 106 senate seats for Latin America, and for that I had to use Mexican and Brazilian state borders going back to their respective monarchies 80 years ago, consolidate Guyana, and put in Chile, Peru, Colombia-Panama, Equator, Venezuela and Argentina as single states, which means that some of them will not only be bigger than California today, they'll remain well above the population of any of the anglo states to the north from the get go, Canada, assuming the 19th century annexionist plans are used and it only becomes 8 states, would just barely balance that out, especially as, in the circumstances, one of them may very well go for the latin-catholic sympathies). You'd need enormous butterflies starting in the Mexican-American war for even a tenth of that to be palatable, european immigration or not.

Apart from that, I guess someone could be creative

Last edited by archaeogeek; September 17th, 2010 at 05:10 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 17th, 2010, 05:51 PM
Gridley Gridley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Everett, WA, USA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by archaeogeek View Post
The main problem you get from this, ultimately, is that the demographics by 1901 were already shifting away from when the US was half the population of the continent... I can already see areas of the old US screaming bloody murder at the size of the congress delegation in latin america (by now, 68% of the House of Reps and even the smallest division I can put together for the senate still has 106 senate seats for Latin America, and for that I had to use Mexican and Brazilian state borders going back to their respective monarchies 80 years ago, consolidate Guyana, and put in Chile, Peru, Colombia-Panama, Equator, Venezuela and Argentina as single states, which means that some of them will not only be bigger than California today, they'll remain well above the population of any of the anglo states to the north from the get go, Canada, assuming the 19th century annexionist plans are used and it only becomes 8 states, would just barely balance that out, especially as, in the circumstances, one of them may very well go for the latin-catholic sympathies). You'd need enormous butterflies starting in the Mexican-American war for even a tenth of that to be palatable, european immigration or not.

Apart from that, I guess someone could be creative
A fair point; however the states might get full representation only slowly. Say, only 1/5 of their congressmen are elected on incorporation, with the percentage rising every other election or so. Senators can't all be introduced at once anyway without throwing off the balanced election the Senate works under.

I think a lot of resentment would be cooled by the idea of it taking (for example) 20 years for the new states to get full representation, while still getting them incorporated well before the deadline.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 17th, 2010, 05:56 PM
Deckhand Deckhand is offline
Pull hard, she comes easy.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The place the Bastards keep annexing.
Posts: 779
White Power Racism goes nuts? Followed by eugenics driven extermination and death camps? The US conquers the western hemisphere and kills off all the non whites?

Then you get your 300 million population and hemispheric US. Not a nice place, but there it is.


Insanely ASB of course but i don't see any other way to fulfill the challenge.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old September 17th, 2010, 05:57 PM
archaeogeek archaeogeek is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gridley View Post
A fair point; however the states might get full representation only slowly. Say, only 1/5 of their congressmen are elected on incorporation, with the percentage rising every other election or so. Senators can't all be introduced at once anyway without throwing off the balanced election the Senate works under.

I think a lot of resentment would be cooled by the idea of it taking (for example) 20 years for the new states to get full representation, while still getting them incorporated well before the deadline.
That could surprisingly potentially help (I hadn't thought of it, since that iirc was mostly historically done for areas with low population): Statehood for Cuba, Puerto Rico+Virgin Islands, invite Haiti and Santi Domingo as well as a testbed to see how the population rescts and expand from there? It would likely not cause much of an issue at this point since that's only 4 states, and can easily be played off into Creole and Spanish voting blocks (but would again require a president that is not Wilson who will even potentially end up having to stand up against Jim Crow laws as you're now dealing with a US that is going to gain not only large latin catholic minorities, but also enormous native minorities, with at least 3 states that are majority native, probably more, and of course even larger black minorities with some states that not only have a black majority but have a history of their black population having actual political power).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old September 17th, 2010, 07:35 PM
Gridley Gridley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Everett, WA, USA
Posts: 1000 or more
I'd like to address another point of the OP: the forty person cabinet.

As of OTL 2010, we have 15, plus a few other cabinet-level appointees.

So to meet the OP, we need:

1. Sec State (as OTL)
2. Sec Treasury (as OTL)
3. Sec Navy (Navy functions of OTL Sec Def)
4. Sec Army (Army functions of OTL Sec Def)
5. Sec Aviation (Air functions of OTL Sec Def)
6. Attorney General (as OTL)
7. Sec Interior (as OTL)
8. Sec Agriculture (as OTL)
9. Sec Commerce (as OTL)
10. Sec Industry (improvement and regulation of industry)
11. Sec Labor (as OTL)
12. Sec Health (Health functions of OTL HHS)
13. Sec Social Services (Welfare functions of OTL HHS)
14. Sec HUD (as OTL)
15. Sec Transportation (as OTL)
16. Sec Energy (as OTL)
17. Sec Education (as OTL)
18. Sec Veteran's Affairs (as OTL)
19. Sec Security (internal security)
20. Sec Intelligence (CIA, NSA, etc.)
21. Chief of Staff (White House)
22. Sec Trade (foreign trade)
23. Sec Environment (EPA, etc.)
24. Sec Science (OTL Science Adviser)
25. Sec Economy (OTL Chair of Economic Advisers)
26. Postmaster General (used to be a cabinet sec in OTL)
27. Sec Public Works (dams, etc.)
28. Sec Business (non-industrial business)
29. Sec Culture (National Endowment for the Arts, etc.)
30. Surgeon General (as OTL, but now Cabinet officer)
31. Inspector General (government audit/internal investigations)
32. Sec Parks (National Parks)
33. Sec District of Columbia (if DC is hosting 3,000,000 people, and is controlled directly by the feds, it needs its own secretary!)
... and I'm still seven short. Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old September 17th, 2010, 07:40 PM
archaeogeek archaeogeek is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1000 or more
I'd say count the president and the vice president, make the director of the peace corps a cabinet position (but that's in the 60s), have a technocratic head of the foreign service drawn from the career diplomats in addition to the SOS...
Still missing three.

Oh! With 150 states, maybe a federal ombudsman/arbitor type to deal with interstate issues specifically since the SCOTUS might be a tad overworked. Something akin to the International Court of Arbitration but for the [del]Empire[/del] United States of All Americas.

(okay apparently HTML and BBCode aren't similar, whodathought )

Last edited by archaeogeek; September 17th, 2010 at 07:52 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old September 17th, 2010, 08:27 PM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
Secretary of Aviation should be Secretary of the Air Force.

There could be a post for the Secretary of Civilian Aviation, which is splitting the Transportation Department, but it wouldn't be too out of fashion with the times in 1920s.

Not sure that the President, Vice President and Chief of Staff should be cabinet positions.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old September 17th, 2010, 08:42 PM
archaeogeek archaeogeek is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe View Post
Secretary of Aviation should be Secretary of the Air Force.

There could be a post for the Secretary of Civilian Aviation, which is splitting the Transportation Department, but it wouldn't be too out of fashion with the times in 1920s.

Not sure that the President, Vice President and Chief of Staff should be cabinet positions.
Okay then, no cheating
- Along with Aviation (maybe a buyout of Aéropostale when it goes under in 1932 would be in order, just for the sake of a Saint-Ex in american service ), you could have a secretary of Shipping separate from commerce, essentially dividing its authority between land, sea and air: a union this size would probably need it to manage.

What about a Chancellor taking up part of the Chief of Staff's job, while the chief of staff remains more of a very powerful private secretary for the president? A more technocratic civil service appointment who essentially organizes the cabinet, keeps minutes, reports to the houses and stuff like that, a bit like in Switzerland, Cabinet level but unlike the VP, not on the presidential succession list maybe.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old September 17th, 2010, 08:56 PM
Workable Goblin Workable Goblin is online now
Spacepony
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Low Equestrian Orbit
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deckhand View Post
White Power Racism goes nuts? Followed by eugenics driven extermination and death camps? The US conquers the western hemisphere and kills off all the non whites?

Then you get your 300 million population and hemispheric US. Not a nice place, but there it is.


Insanely ASB of course but i don't see any other way to fulfill the challenge.
The OP doesn't say the population has to be only 300 million (it's clear they thought that was insanely big, anyways, not having our medical and agricultural technology), just that the US has to cover the whole hemisphere. I don't know how to have that happen, not with a PoD after 1900 (a PoD earlier might be workable...).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old September 17th, 2010, 10:42 PM
Dan Reilly The Great Dan Reilly The Great is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1000 or more
USA wank and airship wank FTW!


The notions behind this article were probably heavily influenced by the manifest destiny craze that was still in effect at the turn of the century. Remember that we had just finished the spanish american war at the time and it wouldn't be too hard to see the US starting some kind of massive crusade to relieve the old world powers of their colonial posessions. Combine that with some kind of white mans burden mentality and it could be easy to see how the writer of the article could forsee the US going into south and central america to "civilize" the peoples there.
__________________
Godforsaken Future: Finally updated!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by HellHound01 View Post
Obviously Dan is Ridley Scott.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old September 17th, 2010, 10:49 PM
nandalf nandalf is offline
nandalf
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Recife-Pe-Brazil
Posts: 323
GreatScot, The War of the Triple aliance was fought from 1864 to 1870.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old September 18th, 2010, 05:55 AM
GreatScottMarty GreatScottMarty is offline
Stuck with Laurens-Burr
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio Country
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by nandalf View Post
GreatScot, The War of the Triple aliance was fought from 1864 to 1870.
Thanks. I knew it didn't sound right. There was I assume a war in South America in 1930s? If you are feeling in an educational mood, What was it called?

@ Union size- why does there still have to be direct election of US Senators ITTL? if you leave that up to legislatures and ensure the legislatures are run by "your people" (local elites i.e. plantation owners, factory owners, shipping magnates and the like) then it is safe to say that this giant US might be more palatable to the WASP minority. Ultimately, for this to work the business interests will have to get along and I think it is possible if the Euro-American and Latino-American elites remember that they have more to gain from working together than they do at odds. I would envision a sort of US that was similar to pre-1865 US OTL. The North controls manufacturing and finance while the southern parts produce raw materials, foodstuffs and misc. agricultural products. Politically speaking, I think ensuring this America holding onto some of it's more conservative tendencies will help perpetuate this giant US.

Where does Canada fit in all this?
__________________
Laurens Lives!! Slaves Freed!! North and South United by Federalism!! Awaiting Reboot December 2011
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old September 18th, 2010, 01:00 PM
stevep stevep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatScottMarty View Post
Thanks. I knew it didn't sound right. There was I assume a war in South America in 1930s? If you are feeling in an educational mood, What was it called?
GreatScottMarty

You're probably thinking of the Chaco war between Paraguay and Bolivia in 1932-35.

Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.