A Kynge of the True Faithe

"A marvellous sweet child, of very mild and generous condition".

So what if that child had become a man? Here begins my second timeline. ;)

The summer of 1553 marks a moment when English history balanced on a knife edge. The teenage King of England, Edward VI, had just begun to take control of his state, when he had been struck down with a major illness, possibly tuberculosis. Had Edward died, the throne would have been inherited by his sister, Mary “the Spaniard”, a radical half Spanish Catholic, whose own claims to the throne were dubious at best. Mary would have undone all of the work of Edward’s early reign, and denied England the great cultural flowering of the later 16th century. It is probably fortunate for us then, that around July 1553, the young King began to show a marked improvement, and by the time of his sixteenth birthday in October, his recovery seemed complete. Archbishop Cranmer ordered celebrations throughout London for this seeming proof of divine favour for the young King.

However, not everyone was so delighted. Mary the Spaniard, the elder sister of Edward, had been waiting now for over twenty years to clear her own name and restore the Catholic faith in England against the Protestant heretics; now her chances appeared to be retreating again. Once more, she was plunged into despair. Her life in England was now becoming intolerable. Over the autumn of 1553, she entered into correspondence with her cousin, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, who agreed to begin another secret expedition to extradite her from England.

The young king was nonetheless extremely wary of his elder sister’s ambitions, and in November he summoned her down to London. Mary sent away his messengers, citing stomach pains, and assured her brother that she would set off for London as soon as she felt well.

In London, this was largely accepted. The Duke of Northumberland, John Dudley, at this stage still had effective control over Edward’s government, and had begun the process of restoring the country to prosperity after the excesses of the past decade. At the end of 1553, Northumberland had bigger fish to fry than the stomach pains of an ageing Catholic bastard princess. Instead, his attentions were focused on Edward’s other sister, the twenty year old Elizabeth. Initially, Northumberland had been looking to the French for a marriage for the Princess, in order to build up an anti-Hapsburg bloc, but over that Christmas, an intriguing new idea hit him, spurred by the arrival in his company of a large group of Hanseatic merchants. To the far east there was a Christian monarch who opposed the power of the Pope who was mightier by far than Edward Tudor; the young Grand Prince of Russia, Ivan IV. In many ways, Ivan seemed the ideal match. Northumberland’s fertile mind immediately began to spin into action. If Russia could become an English ally, then there would finally be a definitive block on Hapsburg advances in the East; and a powerful alliance between Orthodoxy and Protestantism.

So it was, that on December 20th 1553, Northumberland sent an embassy led by Matthew Parker, the Dean of Lincoln, to approach Ivan with the possibility of an alliance. Neither Northumberland nor Parker could possibly have known that their actions would lead to what became one of the most enduring alliances of the period; and one that would eventually spell the doom of the Hapsburgs and their vast dominions. Indeed, for now, Parker complained bitterly of being forced to set out across freezing and stormy seas for Muscovy.

Princess Elizabeth was also rather unconvinced by the plan. In London, Christmas quickly descended into a violent struggle at court between herself and Northumberland, who was attempting to persuade the King to bastardize his sister in favour of his cousin, Northumberland’s daughter-in-law, Jane Grey. In this, Elizabeth won out. Her brother flew into a rage with Northumberland, and seriously threatened to remove Jane totally from the line of succession, let alone promote her. Chastened, the minister retreated. It was the first hint of the Edward that was to emerge; a man devoted to his family and their well being, and, like his father, only too willing to cut down overly successful ministers.

This state of confusion at court gave Mary her chance. One night in late December, evading the guards set up for her by Edward and dressed as a servant, she fled her home in East Anglia. There, accompanied only by her priest and a couple of maids she rowed out into the icy North Sea, where a Spanish ship was waiting, just beyond the reach of the beacons blazing on the shore. As the fugitives reached their saviours, a particularly violent wave swept them into the freezing waters, and only the sounds of their screams of cold alerted the Spanish to their presence. All four were hauled ashore, taken below decks, and wrapped up warm. Then, quietly, the ship sailed off into the night, heading for Antwerp. Mary Tudor had escaped.

She arrived in Antwerp on Christmas morning, 1553. There, she took Communion in the recently constructed Cathedral of our Lady, and gathered a large crowd of priests, before sending word to Vienna and Rome of the arrival of the rightful Queen of England on the Continent.

News reached London of Mary’s escape in the first week of 1554. Immediately, King Edward flew into a towering rage, and lashed out at his council. Northumberland and Cranmer survived the purge, others were not so lucky. William Paget, a former supporter of Edward Seymour, had only recently returned to favour with Edward, but the King had always regarded Paget as being too close to Mary, and too lax in his Protestantism. Now, aged sixteen, Edward was far more of a threat to Paget than he had been three years ago. The statesman was banished from court.

William Paget however chose not to take this treatment lying down. Encouraged by letters from Mary in Antwerp promising the support of the Emperor, in March 1554, he led a revolt from his native Staffordshire. Paget’s rebellion had two clear aims; to depose and murder Edward, and to replace him with a third candidate favourable to both himself and (he hoped) the Emperor; Princess Elizabeth. He aimed to marry Elizabeth off to his oldest son Henry, and so secure for himself the throne. Initially, Paget had huge popular support; the economic chaos of the past decade continued unabated, and the Midlands peasantry, though not as staunchly Catholic as their northern and Welsh compatriots, were becoming increasingly tired by the ceaseless royalist assaults on their church. By 1554, Paget’s rebels had established their headquarters in Lichfield, and had there hunkered down, awaiting a response from London.

While others at court lost their heads, the most senior of Edward’s advisers, Thomas Cranmer, kept his. Cranmer had by now been a dominant figure in English politics for over twenty years, and could remember well the previous great rebellions of 1536 and 1549, something King Edward could not. And Cranmer also had the friendship of one of England’s finest generals, a man even more experienced and intelligent than he was, the Marquess of Winchester, William Paulet. Paulet was so old that he predated the Tudor era itself; he had been born in Hampshire in 1483. He also had military experience, having led royal forces against the rebels in the Pilgrimage of Grace eighteen years previously. It was to this remarkable and energetic septuagenarian that Archbishop Cranmer and Northumberland chose to delegate control of the Royal army to.

Paulet led his forces with remarkable clarity of purpose. He gathered an army of French and Schmalkaldic mercenaries over the spring, and marched north towards Lichfield in July. There, the two Williams met, and Paulet managed to persuade Paget that he if only he lay down his arms, they could together manage to persuade the King to abandon his “brutish heresy”. Paget was not the first to fall for Paulet’s mastery of deception; the Marquess of Winchester had already followed three separate branches of Christianity with apparent devotion, and had found time to lecture both Henry VIII and Edward VI for not doing enough to persecute various heretical sects; even if he later became a member of such sects. The outcome of Paget’s rebellion was inevitable. Paulet managed to keep Paget in talks for a long time, while allowing his peasant army, eager to get back to their farms and families, to disperse of their own free will. The rest of the force was lured back southwards, and then wiped out in a short, brutal battle. William Paget was imprisoned in the tower, where he died six months later. For now, Edward VI was secure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_VI#cite_note-34


1554 Europe.png
 
I like this alot especially that you aided more about Mary's defection which would have caused alot of problems at court, please do update soon:D
 
I like this - the rebellion was good, didnt see that - all the purges show the man Edward is becoming :D
 
Russia was far too removed from European politics to be of any use to England in the 1550's. A better match for Elizabeth would probably be with Eric Vasa of Sweden or a Protestant German Prince.
 
Mary was heir to the throne by Henry VIII's Third Succession Act, which at that time was the law of the land. Though Mary had stormy relations with her younger brother, up to and until Edward VI had a living child Mary was the legal and popular successor to Edward VI. She rather easily overthrew Northampton's plot to place Jane Grey on the throne, and that popular support came from both Catholics and Tudor legitimists. I don't see why she would throw that support away.

Ivan IV did not have direct access to the Baltic Sea. He also was involved in fighting the Swedes, Poles, Lithuanians, and Teutonic Knights, all powers bordering the Baltic Sea. I don't see what possible use an alliance with Russia would have for England. England has little strategic use for Russia, and what little it has is based on the Muscovy Company, which was already forming regardless of marriage negotiations.

If Elizabeth is to be married, it would be within the European alliance system, a system that Russia is not yet involved with on any level.

The Northumberland-Elizabeth-Edward strikes me as a major turning point in the regime. If he is like his father, then a minister demanding things like this of him would cost that minister his head. This seems an excellent time for Edward VI to take real power in England, and have Northumberland executed. The marriage of Northampton's son to Jane Grey is a direct threat to Edward's line, since that makes Northampton loyal to a possible pretender's line. If Edward VI is a Tudor then he will execute Northumberland, and probably Northampton's son and Jane Grey.

If Edward is eager to secure his line on the throne, then would he turn to another foreign bride or possibly a domestic bride of childbearing age?

Henry VIII beheaded open Catholics and burned evangelical Protestants. Though burning heretics was brutal, it was also the common policy, and Edward VI would probably engage in it, champion of Protestantism that he is.

So if Edward VI is a Tudor then he will get rid of overmighty subjects and burn heretics. Northampton is an overmighty subject, and the assassins of Cranmer are traitors and heretics.
 
Mary was heir to the throne by Henry VIII's Third Succession Act, which at that time was the law of the land. Though Mary had stormy relations with her younger brother, up to and until Edward VI had a living child Mary was the legal and popular successor to Edward VI. She rather easily overthrew Northampton's plot to place Jane Grey on the throne, and that popular support came from both Catholics and Tudor legitimists. I don't see why she would throw that support away.

In OTL she made attempts to escape England during Northumberland's "reign". See here and here.

Ivan IV did not have direct access to the Baltic Sea. He also was involved in fighting the Swedes, Poles, Lithuanians, and Teutonic Knights, all powers bordering the Baltic Sea. I don't see what possible use an alliance with Russia would have for England. England has little strategic use for Russia, and what little it has is based on the Muscovy Company, which was already forming regardless of marriage negotiations.

It's a way of extending the grander strategic prowess of England I suppose, and Edward is seduced by the idea of having a Tudor marry into a family that claims descent from the last Roman Emperors. I've got an exciting future planned out for Elizabeth in Russia, but as you seem to be an expert on the period I will defer to your views, do you really think this one is particuarly implausible?

The Northumberland-Elizabeth-Edward strikes me as a major turning point in the regime. If he is like his father, then a minister demanding things like this of him would cost that minister his head. This seems an excellent time for Edward VI to take real power in England, and have Northumberland executed. The marriage of Northampton's son to Jane Grey is a direct threat to Edward's line, since that makes Northampton loyal to a possible pretender's line. If Edward VI is a Tudor then he will execute Northumberland, and probably Northampton's son and Jane Grey.

But in OTL, Edward was a far more gentle character than his father, and moreover, here he realises that the best way to gain support in court is to bide his time. Generally, the relationship between Northumberland and the King is friendly. However, I wouldn't rule out a turn for the worse in future, and maybe then Edward will start to get brutal.

If Edward is eager to secure his line on the throne, then would he turn to another foreign bride or possibly a domestic bride of childbearing age?
The French marriage brought a huge amount of money into England, and secured Edward against the more dangerous Hapsburg threat. I can't see why he'd want to give that up.
 
The French marriage brought a huge amount of money into England, and secured Edward against the more dangerous Hapsburg threat. I can't see why he'd want to give that up.

Particularly when he's just recovered from a illness that could have killed him, would have made him think God was protecting him
 
In OTL she made attempts to escape England during Northumberland's "reign". See here and here.

There were plots, but it appears the Mary was committed to staying in England. Her religion was ignored because to challenge Mary's private Catholicism would force a public showdown between Edward VI's radical Protestantism and the more moderate forces.

It's a way of extending the grander strategic prowess of England I suppose, and Edward is seduced by the idea of having a Tudor marry into a family that claims descent from the last Roman Emperors. I've got an exciting future planned out for Elizabeth in Russia, but as you seem to be an expert on the period I will defer to your views, do you really think this one is particuarly implausible?

I think it is particularly implausible. Russia is very far away, and it has nothing to offer to an England that is concerned with western European machinations, that is the Hapsburg and the French.

I also don't understand how a grand alliance can be built on the back of a bastard's marriage. Downgrading Elizabeth's legal status while trying to marry her off seems extraordinarily misguided.

But in OTL, Edward was a far more gentle character than his father, and moreover, here he realises that the best way to gain support in court is to bide his time. Generally, the relationship between Northumberland and the King is friendly. However, I wouldn't rule out a turn for the worse in future, and maybe then Edward will start to get brutal.

Edward was not ruling England at any point during his OTL life. If he wants to start ruling England he has to kill Northampton. If he doesn't kill Northampton, then Northampton will continue in his position as the de facto ruler of England.

The Tudor dynasty was a series of talented, bloody-minded monarchs. Edward VI could break the mold, and be a puppet-king, but I think that his increasing control of religious policy pointed to a move toward greater control. And thus Northampton's head falling off.
 
Edward was not ruling England at any point during his OTL life. If he wants to start ruling England he has to kill Northampton. If he doesn't kill Northampton, then Northampton will continue in his position as the de facto ruler of England.

Edward didn't exert his will to rule IOTL because he didn't want to - he was still young and learning. While child kings did have a period of regency, until they were 16-18, this period wasn't set in stone in its length. Ultimately regents' powers came from the King, and everyone knew it. While a King who tried to exercise his right at age 10 would be politely laughed at, and then moderated by his councilors and persuaded to follow the regency council, or just distracted, a boy of 15 or 16 (which Edward would have been in 1554) could not be treated thus. He might still be talked to in an attempt to persuade him to default to the council's views, or those of the regent, but if he decided he wanted his way, by this age he would have to be listened to. A boy of 15 who declared that his regent was denying him his right to rule, especially if everyone knew that said regent was indeed refusing to countenance the King's will, could and would be able to have that regent removed from position, and even exiled or executed. While Northumberland (you meant Northumberland and not Northampton, right?) did have an eye for power, there's no way that he would be able to keep the King subservient to his will by the time Edward was reaching maturity. If Edward needed any more ways to exercise his power, he only needed mention Queen Isabella and Lord Mortimer, the lovers who had kept Edward III incarcerated during his minority after they had had Edward II deposed. When Edward III escaped, he had them both executed for their acts. Citing precedent was a powerful tool in mediaeval English courts, just as it is the basis of English law these days.
 
While a match between a Tudor princess and Ivan isn't likely, I wouldn't call it implausible. He was proposed as a potential husband for Elizabeth when she was on the throne in OTL, after all. Elizabeth as an earlier Catherine the Great certainly sounds interesting; perhaps questions over her legitmacy prevent Edward from securing her a more prestigious groom?
 
The Pasha?

No. :p

Nonetheless, Paget’s Rebellion had exposed an important strategic truth to the young King, as long as he continued to behave so violently towards the Church his people loved, he would continue to reap the consequential rebellions. Therefore, in the autumn of 1554, Northumberland unveiled a new project, designed to channel the vast Church wealth amassed by the Crown back to the English people. Naturally, this would not mean the return of any Catholic superstitious practises, since there would be strict controls on where the money went. Edward and Northumberland instead aimed to foster growth in the secular arts, and in education. In this, they were magnificently successful.

The years between 1554 and 1560 saw the opening of no less than thirty eight new grammar schools across England, sponsored personally by the King, who, as a young man himself, saw the importance of educating the other young men of the country. He aimed to create a generation of literate and aggressively Protestant men by employing Protestant preachers as teachers at the new schools, and demanding compulsory Bible-reading sessions daily. In many ways, King Edward’s grammar schools were nothing more than a crude propaganda attempt, but it was nonetheless one that was extremely successful. Many of the brightest and best men of the next century would be educated in these brand new schools, which emphasised typical Protestant and humanist values, while at the same time teaching a twisted version of history intended to make the Papacy seem as repugnant as possible. Within a decade, the grammar schools were bearing fruit.

The second major event of world history in 1554 was of even greater significance; the opening of direct relations between England and Russia. Tsar Ivan had provided a deeply impressive welcome for Matthew Parker and his allies, and quickly convinced them that Princess Elizabeth would be perfectly positioned to create a perfect reordering of Christendom, by tearing down the power of the Pope. Exactly what would replace this, the Tsar diplomatically did not define, due to the chasm of beliefs between Protestantism and Orthodoxy. Nonetheless, Parker was profoundly impressed, and dispatched a flurry of letters back to Northumberland, urging him to recommend the Russian marriage to a still sceptical Princess Elizabeth.

By now though the Princess had little choice in the matter. Edward was now convinced that as long as his sister remained unmarried and in England, his position would be under threat from those who saw her as a convenient vehicle with which to secure the throne. By the end of the year, he was more convinced than ever that he urgently needed to secure the anti-Catholic alliance with the Russians; because events on the Continent had taken a dramatic turn for the worse.

After spending seven months in Antwerp, anxiously awaiting news of Paget’s rebellion, Mary Tudor had finally given up all hope of a popular revolt in England being able to restore her to the throne which she regarded as her own. Instead, she made the reluctant decision to travel east to Vienna, the seat of Hapsburg power, and to meet her cousin, the Emperor Charles V.

By 1554, Charles was not a well man. Exhausted by the demands of thirty years of being the greatest ruler of Christendom, he was now suffering from bad gout and constant stomach pains caused by indigestion. Mary only met him a couple of times, briefly, and even then, he seemed to her chilly and distant. Instead, she chose to spend her time with his younger brother Ferdinand, who was much more welcoming to her. She spent Christmas with him, meeting Charles once, and it was Ferdinand who suggested to her that she make the journey to Rome, where she would be welcomed eagerly by a Vatican that detested Edward’s Protestant regime.

There may also have been an element of political calculation in Ferdinand’s advice. By the end of 1554, it was becoming obvious to many that the elderly Pope, a scandalous sodomite by the name of Julius III, would not last much longer. Ferdinand and Charles both feared that he would be succeeded by the rabidly anti-Hapsburg Cardinal Giovanni Pietro Carafa, who apparently sought the Papal throne only because the Hapsburgs were opposed to him. But, Ferdinand calculated, if he could be forced into supporting Mary over the heretics, then he would have been tamed. It was a brilliant piece of calculation.

Mary set out at the head of a much larger retinue of English exiles and associated Hapsburg officials in March 1555. Unbeknownst to her, events had already begun to move in Rome. Julius III had died to be succeeded by the sensitive and intelligent Marcellus II. Unfortunately, a day after word of Marcellus’ accession reached Mary at Venice, the Pope expired, after a reign of just three weeks. He was succeeded, as the Hapsburgs had feared, by Carafa, who took the Papal name Paul IV.

Fortunately for Ferdinand, the Pope quickly played into his hands. Mary’s entourage at Venice quickly received word that in his early speeches he had rallied against the English, displaying a violent streak of intolerance towards Protestants and Jews. So when Mary arrived at Ravenna on June 8th, 1555, the Pope immediately fell into the obvious trap. He declared Mary to be rightful Queen of England, and invited her to Rome, as Ferdinand had known he would do all along.

It was there, on August 15th that Mary Tudor became the only member of the English monarchy to be crowned in Italy, or by a Pope. In a spectacular ceremony, the Pope violently raged against the wicked heresies of the English, and called on all good Catholics to restore Mary to the throne that was rightfully hers. Mary was quite taken in by the majesty of it all, proclaiming cheerfully to one of her ladies that it was the “happiest day I have lived since the Whore Boleyn fell”.

In England, the news from Rome was greeted with dismay. Mary, despite various attempts to declare her illegitimate and a bastard, enjoyed an immense personal popularity in the country as a whole, being the only Tudor whom the general populace felt had remained true to their faith. Now, barely a year after facing down Paget’s Rebellion, Edward’s government was plunged into trouble again. Northumberland was all in favour of massive purges and executions of Catholics, but Edward, both wily and merciful, was reluctant to provoke further insurrection. Instead, he decided to show his minister who dominated, by ordering the production of a series of strongly anti-Roman pamphlets, emphasising a sense of the “Common Englishmen” rather than a starkly divided nation of Protestants and Catholics.

The “Common English” pamphlets were undoubtedly important, reflecting an important keystone of future Edwardian policy; emphasising nationhood before religion, in order to bind his subjects closer to him. Yet ultimately alone these would have stood little chance of defending England in the face of a concerted assault by the Catholic powers. Though the French seemed peaceful, due to the King’s continuing betrothal to the ten year old princess Elisabeth of Valois, Edward still faced the might of the House of Hapsburg without any completely loyal allies. Fortunately for the King of England, the year 1555 saw the re-emergence of a deadly old threat to the Catholic world. Suleiman the Magnificent was on the march.*

*Well not in OTL, but seeing the continuing divisions in the Catholic world, and the opportunity of aiding the enemies of the Hapsburgs in England, I'm having Suleiman go to war a year after his peace treaty with the Persians has been concluded. In OTL, the Ottomans seem to have intervened to help Protestants at several critical moments, and I don't see why this shouldn't be the case ITTL.
 

Thande

Donor
Interesting work. Some of it seemed questionable at first but then I realised you were writing from an in-timeline perspective (like all that stuff casting aspersions on the legitimacy of Mary Tudor's parentage).
 
Who said I was trying to do this?

Princess Elizabeth was also rather unconvinced by the plan. In London, Christmas quickly descended into a violent struggle at court between herself and Northumberland, who was attempting to persuade the King to bastardize his sister in favour of his cousin, Northumberland’s daughter-in-law, Jane Grey.-paragraph 6 post 1

Isn't that an attempt to bastardizing Elizabeth?
 
Top